while contemporaries are stuck with single digits

It can act as flagship, control air groups

I don't dispute that, but 31 cheap aircraft..

Hypersonic anti-ship weapons

Missile barrages

It can track and engage at LEAST

Ballistic anti-ship missile threats

Fast-attack boat swarms

8 supersonic sea skimming missiles arriving at random intervals, defnding everything within a 6km radius

More than literally any other single ship

That is from it's key specification

as documented by it;s haynes manual

Id like to re-iterate

that's the minimum spec

Missile doctrine especially by China and the Soviet Union (Now Russia) was and still is missile swarms

That's how the Soviets were going to sink the Atlantic carriers

And the ship was designed to defend against exactly that

Yes, but there's a limit to its capabilities, one the enemy will certainly be able to surpass

The sea viper (PAAMS) system was designed specially for integration with other ships

As it would have during the cold war

they can piggy back on it's tracking suit

When attacking carrier groups

*Though, defenses weren't as effective then*

THAT, is the issue with ships in general

Only one needs to get through.

let me once again say, it can track an object the size of a cricket ball moving at mach 3

]200km away

It is a ship designed around a radar

It;s like the A10 of ships

but modern

It can track, but can't engage at that range

It's engagement rate is decided by it;s ability fire enough missiles

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-800_Oniks

not by it's guidance and general radar capabilties

Syria alone as 72 of these missiles

There's lots of other ones I can cite

Shipwrecks arnt that scary when it comes to an actual task force

now I want you to imagine

you have 2 in a carrier task force

some US DDGs

a couple carriers