Else, you're denying them their liberty.

Of BOTH parties.

Not anarchy levels of Liberty

Just as much Liberty as possible while still allowing an orderly society

"People should be allowed to do whatever they want as long as it does not harm people or their Liberty"

"Not anarchy levels of Liberty"

🤔

Paedo talk

I'm pretty sure children can't consent by nature

Already restricting liberty.

Liberty leads to nonces.

It harms the child for one

Give em the bullet.

They're literally not emotionally mature enough to make that decision

Their choise @The Electric Lizard

They can't make that choice yet

Course they can.

Would you deny them their liberty?

"freedoms for me, but not for thee"

Disgusting.

The rule is essentially once you hit 18 you can pretty much do whatever you want as long as it does not harm or impede the Liberty of others

This fucking guy holy shit

Regardless of whether he's ironically playing defense for it or not

you're a retard

It's not "rule for me not for thee"

it's

"lets keep our fucking children safe from scumbags"

How hard of a concept is that to understand

"lets keep our fucking children safe from scumbags"

Not possible under liberalism.

It's not "rule for me not for thee"

I don't think that many Libertarians are so extreme that they want to get rid of the age of consent

Adapted.

Anyone willing to fuck a child is definitely not mentally sound

So?

They're a danger to themselves and others around them

We can have Liberty while keeping it, We don't want the Liberty to do whatever you want, It is as much Liberty as possible while still keeping an orderly society, The age of consent is a normal and reasonable restriction on Liberty

And if someone found out you were fucking kids? Have fun with broken windows, missing wheels and constant ridicule for the rest of your life

because believe it or not being a shitbag has consequences outside the law

"keeping an orderly society"

Should be death not just minor annoyance