Message from @Nathan James 123
Discord ID: 632956088563662881
Under your system you HAVE to allow that child to have sex.
Else, you're denying them their liberty.
Of BOTH parties.
Not anarchy levels of Liberty
Just as much Liberty as possible while still allowing an orderly society
"People should be allowed to do whatever they want as long as it does not harm people or their Liberty"
"Not anarchy levels of Liberty"
🤔
Paedo talk
I'm pretty sure children can't consent by nature
Already restricting liberty.
Liberty leads to nonces.
It harms the child for one
Give em the bullet.
They're literally not emotionally mature enough to make that decision
Their choise @The Electric Lizard
They can't make that choice yet
Course they can.
Would you deny them their liberty?
"freedoms for me, but not for thee"
The rule is essentially once you hit 18 you can pretty much do whatever you want as long as it does not harm or impede the Liberty of others
This fucking guy holy shit
Regardless of whether he's ironically playing defense for it or not
you're a retard
It's not "rule for me not for thee"
it's
"lets keep our fucking children safe from scumbags"
How hard of a concept is that to understand
"lets keep our fucking children safe from scumbags"
Not possible under liberalism.
It's not "rule for me not for thee"
I don't think that many Libertarians are so extreme that they want to get rid of the age of consent
Adapted.
Anyone willing to fuck a child is definitely not mentally sound
So?
They're a danger to themselves and others around them
We can have Liberty while keeping it, We don't want the Liberty to do whatever you want, It is as much Liberty as possible while still keeping an orderly society, The age of consent is a normal and reasonable restriction on Liberty
And if someone found out you were fucking kids? Have fun with broken windows, missing wheels and constant ridicule for the rest of your life
because believe it or not being a shitbag has consequences outside the law
"keeping an orderly society"