Message from @Nathan James 123
Discord ID: 632955908049338418
@Nathan James 123 No, It impedes on their Liberty for one
Fascism is the only cure to the rot
At least fascism had the good graces to duck out after two tries
Communism is the gift that keeps on not giving
No weak libertarian will ever use a rope
No it doesn't. It implies it for both. @The Electric Lizard
Denying them that, denies them their liberty.
Under your system you HAVE to allow that child to have sex.
Else, you're denying them their liberty.
Of BOTH parties.
Not anarchy levels of Liberty
Just as much Liberty as possible while still allowing an orderly society
"People should be allowed to do whatever they want as long as it does not harm people or their Liberty"
"Not anarchy levels of Liberty"
🤔
Paedo talk
I'm pretty sure children can't consent by nature
Already restricting liberty.
Liberty leads to nonces.
It harms the child for one
They're literally not emotionally mature enough to make that decision
Their choise @The Electric Lizard
They can't make that choice yet
Course they can.
Would you deny them their liberty?
"freedoms for me, but not for thee"
Disgusting.
The rule is essentially once you hit 18 you can pretty much do whatever you want as long as it does not harm or impede the Liberty of others
This fucking guy holy shit
Regardless of whether he's ironically playing defense for it or not
you're a retard
It's not "rule for me not for thee"
it's
"lets keep our fucking children safe from scumbags"
How hard of a concept is that to understand
"lets keep our fucking children safe from scumbags"
Not possible under liberalism.
It's not "rule for me not for thee"
I don't think that many Libertarians are so extreme that they want to get rid of the age of consent
Adapted.