Message from @Jeremy

Discord ID: 633369762784870405


2019-10-14 18:18:43 UTC  

alt-right aren't the brightest bunch - you can tell from those that pitch up here

2019-10-14 18:19:25 UTC  

Yeah well, my point still stands

2019-10-14 18:19:38 UTC  

They don't even study their own sources they cite, which contradict the very claims they make while citing those very studies.

2019-10-14 18:19:51 UTC  

It's comical.

2019-10-14 18:19:55 UTC  

I’m pretty sure he’s just working for what he sees as Asian interests, and that’s because of some the things he says

2019-10-14 18:20:11 UTC  

Take the MAOA-L claims.

2019-10-14 18:20:22 UTC  

I thoroughly debunked that cock of shit a couple weeks ago, using the very studies they cite.

2019-10-14 18:20:28 UTC  

MAOA-L?

2019-10-14 18:21:16 UTC  

The so-called "Warrior Gene" they reference on their alternative hypothesis page, as a genetic explanation of black crime rates.

2019-10-14 18:21:54 UTC  

Oh that, I thought the warrior gene did make people more prone to violence

2019-10-14 18:23:13 UTC  

does molyneux think that?

2019-10-14 18:23:33 UTC  

I'll upload my document, with citations, in a moment, as I don't want to double-post.

2019-10-14 18:23:38 UTC  

It's quite lengthy, too.

2019-10-14 18:23:40 UTC  

I haven’t read this article so you know

2019-10-14 18:24:01 UTC  

But just a quick google search seems to say the warrior gene is real and makes people more aggressive

2019-10-14 18:24:19 UTC  

If you misinterpret the statistics in the studies, yes.

2019-10-14 18:24:32 UTC  

So it doesn’t make people more aggressive?

2019-10-14 18:24:47 UTC  

I don’t know anything about this particular gene

2019-10-14 18:25:13 UTC  

I only have passing knowledge about it because of a old documentary about serial killers

2019-10-14 18:25:18 UTC  

No, it's doesn't have enough weight as a contributing variable to explain violence.

2019-10-14 18:25:31 UTC  

Oh ok

2019-10-14 18:25:51 UTC  

So it makes people more aggressive, it just doesn’t match up with the amount

2019-10-14 18:25:57 UTC  

Is that right?

2019-10-14 18:27:17 UTC  

The problem is, the most non-violent populations we know of, possess 3R at a rate as high as African Americans.

2019-10-14 18:28:15 UTC  

The Asians

2019-10-14 18:28:27 UTC  

While the "Extreme Warrior Gene," the 2R variant (lowest active variant), was only found in 5.5% of Africans who self-reported violent delinquent behavior. Thus, this doesn't answer the question about the other 94.5% who didn't possess the gene.

2019-10-14 18:28:49 UTC  

Alright fair enough

2019-10-14 18:29:17 UTC  

But I was just asking if the warrior gene made people more aggressive, not if it explained racial differences

2019-10-14 18:29:19 UTC  

I go into all of the statistics of the studies in the document I linked above.

2019-10-14 18:30:13 UTC  

Well, as I said, based on the studies, it cannot establish sufficient weight as being a variable responsible for producing anti-social behavior.

2019-10-14 18:30:35 UTC  

Just read the document.

2019-10-14 18:31:03 UTC  

I did

2019-10-14 18:31:31 UTC  

Seems like that warrior gene does make you more aggressive but it’s way to rare to explain racial differences

2019-10-14 18:31:42 UTC  

That’s what I got from it

2019-10-14 18:34:10 UTC  

It depends on which gene we're talking about.

2019-10-14 18:34:32 UTC  

2R is highly rare among all races, while 3R is possessed by nearly half the population of every race.

2019-10-14 18:34:41 UTC  

4R, on the other hand, is most common.

2019-10-14 18:35:14 UTC  

We all know 1 in 2 of every individual, within our races, is not a serial killer.

2019-10-14 18:35:18 UTC  

😂