Maybe even to their expense

So it doesn’t take involvement from the Chinese government

That's also likely.

Either way I look at him as a threat more than anything

most people see him as the UBI meme

His idea would see nearly all of our producers of elastic goods and services go out of business.

Yeah he‘ll get a lot of alt right votes and meme votes

He’s tricked alt right types that he’ll look out for white people but it’s not true

alt-right aren't the brightest bunch - you can tell from those that pitch up here

Yeah well, my point still stands

They don't even study their own sources they cite, which contradict the very claims they make while citing those very studies.

It's comical.

I’m pretty sure he’s just working for what he sees as Asian interests, and that’s because of some the things he says

Take the MAOA-L claims.

I thoroughly debunked that cock of shit a couple weeks ago, using the very studies they cite.

MAOA-L?

The so-called "Warrior Gene" they reference on their alternative hypothesis page, as a genetic explanation of black crime rates.

Oh that, I thought the warrior gene did make people more prone to violence

does molyneux think that?

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/01/090121093343.htm

I'll upload my document, with citations, in a moment, as I don't want to double-post.

It's quite lengthy, too.

I haven’t read this article so you know

But just a quick google search seems to say the warrior gene is real and makes people more aggressive

If you misinterpret the statistics in the studies, yes.

So it doesn’t make people more aggressive?

I don’t know anything about this particular gene

I only have passing knowledge about it because of a old documentary about serial killers

No, it's doesn't have enough weight as a contributing variable to explain violence.

Oh ok

So it makes people more aggressive, it just doesn’t match up with the amount

Is that right?

Here you go: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1RNG94aobu7RCr9wsr8V_pcJgDgYny-KB

The problem is, the most non-violent populations we know of, possess 3R at a rate as high as African Americans.

The Asians

While the "Extreme Warrior Gene," the 2R variant (lowest active variant), was only found in 5.5% of Africans who self-reported violent delinquent behavior. Thus, this doesn't answer the question about the other 94.5% who didn't possess the gene.

Alright fair enough

But I was just asking if the warrior gene made people more aggressive, not if it explained racial differences

I go into all of the statistics of the studies in the document I linked above.

Well, as I said, based on the studies, it cannot establish sufficient weight as being a variable responsible for producing anti-social behavior.

Just read the document.