Message from @Snake
Discord ID: 633371206795657217
It's quite lengthy, too.
I haven’t read this article so you know
But just a quick google search seems to say the warrior gene is real and makes people more aggressive
If you misinterpret the statistics in the studies, yes.
So it doesn’t make people more aggressive?
I don’t know anything about this particular gene
I only have passing knowledge about it because of a old documentary about serial killers
No, it's doesn't have enough weight as a contributing variable to explain violence.
Oh ok
So it makes people more aggressive, it just doesn’t match up with the amount
Is that right?
The problem is, the most non-violent populations we know of, possess 3R at a rate as high as African Americans.
The Asians
While the "Extreme Warrior Gene," the 2R variant (lowest active variant), was only found in 5.5% of Africans who self-reported violent delinquent behavior. Thus, this doesn't answer the question about the other 94.5% who didn't possess the gene.
Alright fair enough
But I was just asking if the warrior gene made people more aggressive, not if it explained racial differences
I go into all of the statistics of the studies in the document I linked above.
Well, as I said, based on the studies, it cannot establish sufficient weight as being a variable responsible for producing anti-social behavior.
Just read the document.
Seems like that warrior gene does make you more aggressive but it’s way to rare to explain racial differences
That’s what I got from it
It depends on which gene we're talking about.
2R is highly rare among all races, while 3R is possessed by nearly half the population of every race.
4R, on the other hand, is most common.
We all know 1 in 2 of every individual, within our races, is not a serial killer.
😂
Uh m8
There is a communist you need to debate in general
Baba
Is his name
If you examine social variables, they possess profoundly greater weight, and what started my argument against the MAOA-L was discussion of pricing people out of both consumer and labor markets with artificial price control, such as the minimum wage, when we can clearly see black unemployment was lower than white unemployment before we brought an end to segregation and subjected them to the same central planning we were imposing on our ourselves. Not only that, but their poverty reduction rate was at 75%, slowing to 17% after the end of segregation, then they went on a counter-culture, known as the Harlem cultural revolution, rejecting all of the regulatory social norms conducive to civilized and productive society, because they began associating it with white culture when we were forced to integrate. They interpreted literacy and education as enslavement to the white man after segregation ended.
I want to see this
Inconvenient truths so-called "liberals" don't want to address, by the way.
While they continue to craft the very policies holding impoverished communities by the neck.
Lol, alright.
Well I would say neo liberalism is holding African countries down
I mean look at the policies France is pushing on its former colonies or China
Yeah France are really arseholes with their African colonies
Though I’m not saying Africa will ever be first world