Else they go homeless

*Put the poors to work for a poor wage so they shut up*

De facto the system we have now

This isn't PeP vibes

No PeP is liberal

This is PeP 2: Victorian age boogaloo

But yeah. Restricting sufferage based on education encourages massive University structures we deffintely don't want

College level is the standard education level

@Nathan James 123 are you forgetting all of history, peasant revolts are a recurring theme there nathy boi

The buisness/land owning method of the old us makes more sense

IE, people that stay in education until 18.

But no nathan

We arnt gonna yeet back to pre 1918

@killerqwerty The current day isn't history. Poor live infinately better lives than peasants of the past

Oh boy, people need to stay in state run education for 18 years to vote... I see no flaws with this plan

And that's why we will continue to fail @Joshu

*Continue to fail*

people in the 900s or so had a better work life balance than us now

being a peasant was based

Wholesome life tbh @Death in June

Nathan, what specific subject(s) are required in order to be allowed to vote?

Why should you be allowed to vote Nathan?

that main issue in those days was poor medical technology and malthusian traps, i think

No specific subjects. You just need to complete college level education @Crafty

Id say no age restriction, but either propertied or service sufferage.

I mean all people for selective suffereage ALWAYS include themselves

I have over a college level education, I'm over the age and I'm a land owner @Joshu

Because they are selfish that way

And want their own way

If we were going to do something other than raw age

@Nathan James 123 those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it, taking away people's belief that they can change the system non violently won't stop them from trying to change the system.

That is the only reason to want to gerrymander the system in that way

It's the same as those wanting illegals to be able to vote

Education sufferage is litteraly institutionalist technocracy

Or, required national service

It's just because their ideas suck and can't get support

That's another good requirement

So throw their toys out of the pram

So you're actually vested in the country and have actually worked for your ability to vote

I do quite like that, but I doubt the government will bring back national service

maybe property requirements for voting made more sense before the concentration of capital that we've seen starting in the late 19th century