So, you recolour artwork using a bot and post it here, Comando? That's not very OC.

It is rather OC. It is you creating something that did not before exist. Additionally existing colours present in art tend to effect the quality of any colouring done. None of the things I posted before were originally coloured.

Donut Steel.

That applies to a piece of art which currently exists, and deliberately recolouring it, as opposed to adding colour to something which prior had none.

@Comando so, you are a colour artist?

Not really. I pretty much picked it up to colour in Tanya sketches

Still, good stuff. My colour theory sucks, I just can't get nuances right.

i have a bad monitor

'ere we go

@juryrigging https://imgur.com/gallery/rEoRlqW

Open the link, as its a gallery to multiple images

I did put an entire manga through

Not sure how good idea it is to share an entire manga here unless it is in public domain

Interesting. The pallete image definitely has a different feel to a lot of the pages while at the same time it's clear it's the base. But what Skip said.

This would be covered under fair use due to the transformative nature of what I did to it. More informally manga is easily accessible online, and take downs aren't levelled at sites hosting manga, unless they're making a profit off of it in practice.
I don't intend making a habbit of it though.

I just know this would be illegal where I live but extremely unlikely to get you into trouble.

copyright is a failed system that needs to be done away with anyway for the good of mankind, otherwise the only ones benefiting from the system is those in china who do not listen to the international 'laws'

You can discuss that topic in particular elsewhere

^

I'm only speaking about this, as its literally to defend what I've posted.

Yeah, discussion about art is allowed, as is discussion derived thereof, but only to a certain extent. Very broad and general topics like the usefulness of copyright is better discussed elsewhere, I’m afraid.

But discussing things like colour theory, technique, style etc. is fine

A discussion worth having in the server management that where the lines should be drawn in cases like this. There was a case of a person posting a whole shrek movie here some months ago and having it color shifted would likely change very little in that case.

Something to think about for the sake of existance of the server.

Fair point. We will have to look up what fair use counts as suitably transformative and come up with sme guidelines. Certainly full feature colour-shifted Shrek would not qualify.

Question:
If it's my art, can I post lewd images?
To be specific, neither of the private parts is truly visible, but the girl's naked.

Channel is not marked nsfw so server/discord rules still apply here.

Thaanks

i KNEW IT

fake child

I never said I was a child... I said I drew a kid.
There is a difference. : )

i mean you were all like roleplaying a child

and i was nice

though i did mention you could be a troll/roleplayer/fake

nooo, that's just my style of writing, I hate being all serious and stuff : D
but that's not really a channel for that conv, now is it?

>wants to post lewd art
>says he draws kids
<:thinkpedo:462282562190966784>

wasn't it a 9 year old

hold on

ummm, they don't have to be the same drawing, you know? <:hypersmugon:544638648721604608>

O.K02/15/2019
I would call that an "11yo code" rather than a "trap code" : D

Yeah, I meant that the character was 11yo, not a trap