Message from @smiley boy
Discord ID: 569606430102126592
Your face is the only thing remotely funny about you
Done with projection?
lol insulting wywy for no reason
are you mr e?
English, do you speak it?
No
i would say so by te misdirection
I speak american you commie bitch
lol
Either works.
I wish i was born in thailand
Good for you.
@Anon Xer0 you so hostile
and retarded
Thailand is trap nation
Projection once more.
I'm actually quite happy to see you.
The average temp in thailand is 87 f
this is you happy
Therefore
Traps are hot
<:troll:312064734113431553> <:troll_king:312064227542040576> <:troll:312064734113431553> <:troll_king:312064227542040576> <:troll:312064734113431553> <:troll_king:312064227542040576>
<:caring:312066184948350976>
Im right
Sure.
Wanna see me irl
This is me irl 👌 👌 👌 👌
Do you always have a bandage on your nose?
Sometimes
Also thats actually just my goals im ugly af rn
aren't we all
True
marx = jew In the first volume of Das Kapital, Marx suggests that productive labour may be a misfortune:
That labourer alone is productive, who produces surplus-value for the capitalist, and thus works for the valorisation of capital. If we may take an example from outside the sphere of production of material objects, a schoolmaster is a productive labourer when, in addition to belabouring the heads of his scholars, he works like a horse to enrich the school proprietor. That the latter has laid out his capital in a teaching factory, instead of in a sausage factory, does not alter the relation. Hence the notion of a productive labourer implies not merely a relation between work and useful effect, between labourer and product of labour, but also a specific, social relation of production, a relation that has sprung up historically and stamps the labourer as the direct means of creating surplus-value. To be a productive labourer is, therefore, not a piece of luck, but a misfortune.
Hey offender
Ill ping yo ass if you dont reply
Have you ever read marx