Message from @smiley boy
Discord ID: 569606409843507233
you are just looping trying to gain a pointless edge in a debate
by not using arguments but spiels
Your face is the only thing remotely funny about you
Done with projection?
lol insulting wywy for no reason
are you mr e?
English, do you speak it?
No
i would say so by te misdirection
I speak american you commie bitch
lol
Either works.
I wish i was born in thailand
Good for you.
@Anon Xer0 you so hostile
and retarded
Thailand is trap nation
Projection once more.
I'm actually quite happy to see you.
this is you happy
Which is pretty hot
Therefore
Traps are hot
<:troll:312064734113431553> <:troll_king:312064227542040576> <:troll:312064734113431553> <:troll_king:312064227542040576> <:troll:312064734113431553> <:troll_king:312064227542040576>
<:caring:312066184948350976>
Im right
Sure.
Wanna see me irl
This is me irl 👌 👌 👌 👌
Do you always have a bandage on your nose?
Sometimes
Also thats actually just my goals im ugly af rn
aren't we all
True
marx = jew In the first volume of Das Kapital, Marx suggests that productive labour may be a misfortune:
That labourer alone is productive, who produces surplus-value for the capitalist, and thus works for the valorisation of capital. If we may take an example from outside the sphere of production of material objects, a schoolmaster is a productive labourer when, in addition to belabouring the heads of his scholars, he works like a horse to enrich the school proprietor. That the latter has laid out his capital in a teaching factory, instead of in a sausage factory, does not alter the relation. Hence the notion of a productive labourer implies not merely a relation between work and useful effect, between labourer and product of labour, but also a specific, social relation of production, a relation that has sprung up historically and stamps the labourer as the direct means of creating surplus-value. To be a productive labourer is, therefore, not a piece of luck, but a misfortune.
Hey offender
Ill ping yo ass if you dont reply