Ofc not hes a magafag

plenty of regions throughout history have decided that

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Turin_(1860)#The_Treaty

>Currently googling what plebiscite means

the savoy and nice regions of italy became french in 1860 because the people living there decided that they were french

wy tho

because that's the least violent and most successful way of doing it

you ever hear of a savoy separatist movement?

no, because they were allowed to join with france when they asked

cant say i have read up on it

What about Russia invading polans or wherevwr

which time

unfortunately plebiscites are also fairly uncommon because they require both sides being willing to lose territory

Whataboutism counter: 1

Do you mean people make arguments with accurate comparisons to the event at hand

It is mindblowing

>Bronie

You have no opinion

😢

My weakness 😢

how is a military invasion in any way connected to separatism or diplomatic independence/annexation

Stupid low iq ppl thinking they can trol 😃

they will be gassed

Da gommie Jew that is self explanatory

the russian invasion of poland isn't in any way similar to the french annexation of savoy and nice

okem to inform, state the differences

first of all we're going to have to decide on which invasion of poland

ikr lol

let's go with poland-lithuania

because the polish-lithuanian commonwealth was cool

Which one is most compaarable tho?

so we're looking at a military invasion without diplomacy against the will of the civilian population of that area

with the savoy thing

You mean when it was divvied up by Prussia, Austria, and Russia.

versus a diplomatic annexation agreed upon by both sides, after consulting the civilian population of the area

and you're trying to tell me these are similar

who are you asking this gommie?

I'm addressing apple here

I heard Russia marched in and took over recently but maybe that was somewhere else? Idk

...

nothing recent

Vladimir did that somewhere over there