Message from @ApplicationBot
Discord ID: 577111777876246549
there might be undiscovered variables
in fact most are flawed usually
dude
you are mistaking paid vs non paid
paid isnt sience
what
that is finding a otest to get x outcome
when you say most are flawed
you mean research right
i mean articles that claim to be backed by scientific data
sure there are valid tests that are useful
its mainly because of introduced bias to get a out come
but it's all kinda all over the place seems to me
you can use science in that way but that is just cherry picking data
also it works on the basis of previous discoveries
yes
well
here is the thing , a lot of articles just write shit , post some random link that involves the subjeckt and acall that source
that isnt the same as cold research data
based on a pre layed out varrible
then ther is the cherry picking data
you can never have 100% clean objective data
go look at prostate cancer pro articles, and the research they link. it is cherry picked
plain lies
but if ou look at the data , you see these lies
there is no doubth science is truth
its what ppl do with that truth
there is always a set accuracy testing things , sure, but it is as close you can get to pure fact
and usally when you are not 100% it is learly acknoledged
you dont get the nature of the fact though
its a mathematical model of it
sure
are we still talking about race
i would argue that the "nature" is in the varriables
no science
and crooked interpertation of it
we dont know what it is
at least i am 😄
but , oke ther is science
and you said reason