what

that is finding a otest to get x outcome

when you say most are flawed

you mean research right

i mean articles that claim to be backed by scientific data

sure there are valid tests that are useful

its mainly because of introduced bias to get a out come

but it's all kinda all over the place seems to me

you can use science in that way but that is just cherry picking data

also it works on the basis of previous discoveries

yes

well

here is the thing , a lot of articles just write shit , post some random link that involves the subjeckt and acall that source

that isnt the same as cold research data

based on a pre layed out varrible

yes

then ther is the cherry picking data

you can never have 100% clean objective data

go look at prostate cancer pro articles, and the research they link. it is cherry picked

plain lies

but if ou look at the data , you see these lies

there is no doubth science is truth

its what ppl do with that truth

there is always a set accuracy testing things , sure, but it is as close you can get to pure fact

and usally when you are not 100% it is learly acknoledged

you dont get the nature of the fact though

its a mathematical model of it

sure

are we still talking about race

i would argue that the "nature" is in the varriables

no science

and crooked interpertation of it

we dont know what it is

at least i am 😄

but , oke ther is science

and you said reason

but that is based on a pre set of situations and expirances

and also simulation in which you way out sets of information aka data

to get a result

i just meant there's other ways of thinking about the world

not just through science