Message from @Deleted User

Discord ID: 577092976589668362


2019-05-12 08:38:44 UTC  

wtf

2019-05-12 08:38:55 UTC  

that is not spaming reeee

2019-05-12 08:39:17 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/308950154222895104/577052166972506112/Screen_Shot_2019-05-11_at_3.36.10_PM.png

2019-05-12 08:39:30 UTC  

<a:kiwihours:549732290243067909>

2019-05-12 08:39:43 UTC  

Are you the nz shooter?

2019-05-12 08:39:47 UTC  

<:supersweatfurrowed:464568057206145024>

2019-05-12 08:40:00 UTC  

Maybe you are 😉

2019-05-12 08:40:22 UTC  

<:notlikemiya:356346595375317004>

2019-05-12 08:42:02 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/308950154222895104/577052856696176652/Screen_Shot_2019-05-11_at_3.23.22_PM.png

2019-05-12 09:07:10 UTC  

read muh seeje

2019-05-12 10:12:48 UTC  

@DoobyCooby hes negroid and that image is from pintrest

2019-05-12 10:13:33 UTC  

@ApplicationBot the term isnt a biological term, this doesnt means that the ppl dont exist, you jew

2019-05-12 10:14:22 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/308950154222895104/577076095489409034/iu.png

2019-05-12 10:14:28 UTC  

this guy is actaully berber

2019-05-12 10:14:36 UTC  

and caucasoid

2019-05-12 10:15:55 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/308950154222895104/577076482732458006/unknown.png

2019-05-12 10:16:17 UTC  

by american legal definition all these ppl are white

2019-05-12 10:16:36 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/308950154222895104/577076657941250058/race_social_construct_form_every_one_is_white_if_they_are_born_in_a_ones_white_nation..png

2019-05-12 10:19:25 UTC  

>legal definition

2019-05-12 10:19:37 UTC  

what are you trying to prove

2019-05-12 11:21:27 UTC  

idk, but i just got a link posted in a attempt to prove me wrong, but in fact it kinda sums up my point in the abstract "Race was once thought to be a real biological kind. Today the dominant view is that objective biological races don't exist. I challenge the trend to reject the biological reality of race by arguing that cladism (a school of classification that individuates taxa by appeal to common ancestry) provides a new way to define race biologically. I also reconcile the proposed biological conception with constructivist theories about race. Most constructivists assume that biological realism and social constructivism are incompatible views about race; I argue that the two conceptions can be compatible."

2019-05-12 11:23:06 UTC  

How did that dude even think that this was a sceintific source reverence ?

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/308950154222895104/577093392891248640/unknown.png

2019-05-12 11:23:51 UTC  

if you make a webpage slap the word science on there,ppl wwill think it is factual and 100% truth

2019-05-12 11:31:15 UTC  

science is simply a method

2019-05-12 11:31:17 UTC  

one of many

2019-05-12 12:08:00 UTC  

oke what else is there besides testing something , to then getting the same results doing the same test every time

2019-05-12 12:31:06 UTC  

reason

2019-05-12 12:32:49 UTC  

but with science just because you test something and get repetitive results doesn't mean it's the truth

2019-05-12 12:33:20 UTC  

there might be undiscovered variables

2019-05-12 12:33:23 UTC  

in fact most are flawed usually

2019-05-12 12:33:30 UTC  

dude

2019-05-12 12:33:38 UTC  

you are mistaking paid vs non paid

2019-05-12 12:33:44 UTC  

paid isnt sience

2019-05-12 12:33:50 UTC  

what

2019-05-12 12:33:52 UTC  

that is finding a otest to get x outcome

2019-05-12 12:34:15 UTC  

when you say most are flawed

2019-05-12 12:34:23 UTC  

you mean research right

2019-05-12 12:34:38 UTC  

i mean articles that claim to be backed by scientific data

2019-05-12 12:34:47 UTC  

sure there are valid tests that are useful

2019-05-12 12:34:48 UTC  

its mainly because of introduced bias to get a out come

2019-05-12 12:35:03 UTC  

but it's all kinda all over the place seems to me