Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 577075887862972446
Dunno
When i become a pilot
Im gonna put the cock in cockpit
Wassa wassa wassa
Bitconeeeect
>:)
<:Ping:446203773774200833>
<:Sadgiri:482411561647079454>
wtf
that is not spaming reeee
<a:kiwihours:549732290243067909>
Are you the nz shooter?
<:supersweatfurrowed:464568057206145024>
Maybe you are 😉
<:notlikemiya:356346595375317004>
read muh seeje
@DoobyCooby hes negroid and that image is from pintrest
this guy is actaully berber
and caucasoid
by american legal definition all these ppl are white
>legal definition
what are you trying to prove
idk, but i just got a link posted in a attempt to prove me wrong, but in fact it kinda sums up my point in the abstract "Race was once thought to be a real biological kind. Today the dominant view is that objective biological races don't exist. I challenge the trend to reject the biological reality of race by arguing that cladism (a school of classification that individuates taxa by appeal to common ancestry) provides a new way to define race biologically. I also reconcile the proposed biological conception with constructivist theories about race. Most constructivists assume that biological realism and social constructivism are incompatible views about race; I argue that the two conceptions can be compatible."
How did that dude even think that this was a sceintific source reverence ?
if you make a webpage slap the word science on there,ppl wwill think it is factual and 100% truth
science is simply a method
one of many
oke what else is there besides testing something , to then getting the same results doing the same test every time
reason
but with science just because you test something and get repetitive results doesn't mean it's the truth
there might be undiscovered variables
in fact most are flawed usually
dude
you are mistaking paid vs non paid