Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 577117838507245569
Conclusion
human perception is what humans are and that perception isn't objective but is rather obswserved through consciousness
source wiki
so unless you know what consciousness is you can never know what perception and thus reality is
and you can also never know what consciousness is
i think scientific method and thought are the same
science is only "useful" not a truthteller
you get data process it as logical and rational as posible to get a outcome
when you get new insights you gain moa more accurate conclusion
science is based on this
yes
that thoeries get proven and new theoies develop from those discoveries just as more expirances leed to more discoveries in life
then there is flawed thinking and bas science , which i think is your problem with science
well
assume you can have 100% pure science with no paradigm, containing ALL data and be clear
you would only be describing the world through you own lens then
that isnt the way of scinece as you should always look for variables and anomolies
AND you would have the problem of base assumptions
it is open to the fact that it could be wrong
and a stacking of mistakes and mis assumtions
you claim that objective science is the one that is simply a concensus among people
no
mainstream science is
mainstream science is objective?
"science"
No nigger, where do i say that
it isnt as it is based on bad assumtions
you can't have perfect science
you can
if you know all varravles
you dont
and some you havent discovered
@ApplicationBot don't fall for it
Just block him and move on
?
He just wants attention
well, thanks for rubbing that in, sure i dont know all variables, but if you would have those and dont have a bias you can have 100% perfect science
we are discussing
He doesn't discuss