Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 577117455126626304
you can never know if thats the objective reality though
Like hey, this group in our country has a low socioeconomic status, WHY could that be? Well many reasons yes... But, it could be an indicator that that group has lower intelligence.
its just a description using human language
you can look at the moleculair relative accelaration to see what the temprature is
I wouldn't assume that without more evidence though
But god damn the hoops some people will jump through to avoid that
Conclusion
human perception is what humans are and that perception isn't objective but is rather obswserved through consciousness
source wiki
so unless you know what consciousness is you can never know what perception and thus reality is
and you can also never know what consciousness is
i think scientific method and thought are the same
science is only "useful" not a truthteller
you get data process it as logical and rational as posible to get a outcome
when you get new insights you gain moa more accurate conclusion
science is based on this
yes
that thoeries get proven and new theoies develop from those discoveries just as more expirances leed to more discoveries in life
well
assume you can have 100% pure science with no paradigm, containing ALL data and be clear
you would only be describing the world through you own lens then
that isnt the way of scinece as you should always look for variables and anomolies
AND you would have the problem of base assumptions
it is open to the fact that it could be wrong
ppl are not, which again leads to bad scienece
and a stacking of mistakes and mis assumtions
you claim that objective science is the one that is simply a concensus among people
no
mainstream science is
mainstream science is objective?
"science"
No nigger, where do i say that
it isnt as it is based on bad assumtions
you can't have perfect science
you can
if you know all varravles
you dont
and some you havent discovered