godel's incompletness theorem

sure but that stems from the assumption that the scienece is done by flawed beings

also science works withing naturalism only

if that's wrong then its all wrong

who dont have knowledge of all the varrables

how would you go about doing science of consciusness

if you prove it doesnt come from the brain

or god

i would compare scienec with 100% rational thought, knowing the varriables

some ppl just think more scientifically and logically

mainly due to the ability to grasp and analise the many varaiables at the same time to draw a conlusion

what im saying is that the conclusion isnt the truth but our subjective representation of the world

sure, you are slave to the data you have

an artists sees it in an artistic way, scientist in a scientific

neither is closer to the truth

and this is based on the validility of previous made conclusions

both survive in the same manner

yes

artis are wrong

fucking idiots

irrational beings

illogical

**honestly i dont have a bias against artiists ** kugh

i think the world behaves rationally because we are rational

we see it through a lens

1+1= 2 shoot me

thats math

yeah its the truth

oh well

maybe

we dont know do we

there is no grey zone, it is right or wrong

you assume dualism there

you might have a obkective making something seem right, but it aint

if it isnt

an assumption might make a bias

that then makes u think ur right by proving your bias with a biased method

this is why scinece doesnt makes assumptions, nor should a brain

it does though

considering the brain part, it isnt healthy

naa, nbad scientist make assumtions