Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 577120544718192674
so you need to taak scienece and find out if those assumtions are correct
to get 100% accuracy you need to know all the varrbles
Like you are not worth my time any more borzo
i didnt block you as you show that you are at least a half wit
well
godel's incompletness theorem
sure but that stems from the assumption that the scienece is done by flawed beings
also science works withing naturalism only
if that's wrong then its all wrong
who dont have knowledge of all the varrables
how would you go about doing science of consciusness
if you prove it doesnt come from the brain
or god
i would compare scienec with 100% rational thought, knowing the varriables
some ppl just think more scientifically and logically
mainly due to the ability to grasp and analise the many varaiables at the same time to draw a conlusion
what im saying is that the conclusion isnt the truth but our subjective representation of the world
sure, you are slave to the data you have
an artists sees it in an artistic way, scientist in a scientific
neither is closer to the truth
both survive in the same manner
yes
artis are wrong
fucking idiots
irrational beings
illogical
**honestly i dont have a bias against artiists ** kugh
i think the world behaves rationally because we are rational
we see it through a lens
1+1= 2 shoot me
thats math
yeah its the truth
oh well
maybe
we dont know do we
there is no grey zone, it is right or wrong
you assume dualism there
you might have a obkective making something seem right, but it aint
if it isnt
an assumption might make a bias