Message from @Deleted User

Discord ID: 312136852867907604


2017-05-11 07:21:14 UTC  

Because it oversteps on everyone

2017-05-11 07:22:19 UTC  

@Deleted User and what we have to fight against?

2017-05-11 07:23:26 UTC  

People do not break the mold because it is too costly. This social compliance is evidence of passivism. Rational behaviour from an atomised perspective, but this is not reality. Individualism is ironically the path to exploitation

2017-05-11 07:26:22 UTC  

@Firefly You tell me. The enemy depends on your ideology. Is there a way to get consensus between different political ideology? I don't know. But it is a line in the sand. And getting bearings in the 'competition of ideas' is an important starting point.

2017-05-11 07:28:25 UTC  

@Deleted User I'm asking you. I may have a completely different vision from you.

2017-05-11 07:31:32 UTC  

Personally I have little ambition to 'fix' anything. I was entertaining your question on how to bring the libertarians into camps. Your question implied there was common ground between left and right authoritarianism. Thinking about this I was hesitant to say anything specific about activism in the world, because in the current climate it is easy to go from 0 to life imprisonment by mere suggestion.

2017-05-11 07:33:12 UTC  

I guess I do not know enough about your political stance to answer in more detail.

2017-05-11 07:33:31 UTC  

@Firefly What is your stance on 'Socialism in One Nation'?

2017-05-11 07:34:49 UTC  

Stalin thought we can establish a country that will later unite the world.

2017-05-11 07:35:16 UTC  

I agree. We can do it, yes. @Deleted User

2017-05-11 07:41:40 UTC  

@Firefly In this case perhaps we could get a consensus on the strong nation state. I do not like Mussolini, but he did comment on his admiration of Stalin, saying the Soviet Union was Slavic Nationalism. The full nationalisation of that society is very bold. Perhaps if Fascism was allowed to mature and analysis its own weaknesses, it too would look more towards full state control. But to do this from the onset was seen as too costly for the relatively developed Europe.

2017-05-11 07:47:12 UTC  

@Deleted User strong nation state may be a priority, yes. The unity is possible on an anti-imperialist basis. If you support our anti-imperialist world crusade.

2017-05-11 07:47:48 UTC  

<:af:312037249166606337>

2017-05-11 07:50:53 UTC  

I guess what I am really getting is a pretty radical position. You have to disrupt people's comfort zones and force them into take an a side on an absolute question.
Whatever the policy, is has to have real consequences. The individual will not take notice until he is personally effected.

2017-05-11 07:51:29 UTC  

Lets disrupt

2017-05-11 07:56:02 UTC  

In my opinion, politics and government has lost respect. Politics has lost its sense of urgency and consequence.

2017-05-11 07:56:27 UTC  

Question: is your vision of the proletariat an 'us vs them' idea?

2017-05-11 07:57:46 UTC  

The way to break into the Right wing mentality is to present a strong character that commands respect.

2017-05-11 07:58:35 UTC  

What is the character of the proletariat?

2017-05-11 07:59:58 UTC  

What I like about 'Socialism in One Nation' is that it counts its pieces. It makes clear what is friend and foe.

2017-05-11 08:00:24 UTC  

That dichotomy is how you make people choose a side.

2017-05-11 08:01:39 UTC  

Alligence to the Party is the way to solve dichtomy

2017-05-11 08:02:41 UTC  

You have to show clearly what the consequences will be if people choose the wrong side and make it credible enough for them to address it. Whether the threat is real or imagined doesn't matter. It brings the struggle into people's consciousness.

2017-05-11 08:03:33 UTC  

That just technicalities. We should use every way possible.

2017-05-11 08:05:09 UTC  

Sure. I am saying you have to force the issue, or it will get no where. At this point Left Authoritarianism seems pretty Fascist to me! <:troll:312064734113431553>

2017-05-11 08:07:05 UTC  

I'm not against of the use of force against any fascist without an alligence.

2017-05-11 08:07:09 UTC  

<:troll_king:312064227542040576>

2017-05-11 08:07:36 UTC  

In my view, Fascism is built around the Volksgeist, the 'spirit of the people'. It is interchangable whatever it is. Where Marxism fills that is not for me to judge! It is all the same.

2017-05-11 08:08:57 UTC  

What a weird place I find myself.

2017-05-11 08:13:33 UTC  

The more I think about it, the weirder it gets. Marxism resolves the eternal struggle between ingroup and outgroup by making the ingroup everyone. That is the same as the final victory. Very admirable.

2017-05-11 08:15:24 UTC  

The Right often debates and counters with the idea that the human hardware can not handle such objective notions. Not yet. The overcoming of man's shortcomings is implicit in a Communist vision of the future. This is a very Nietzsche idea.

2017-05-11 08:16:22 UTC  

'The New Soviet Man' is an interesting formation of this idea.

2017-05-11 09:24:14 UTC  

Overcoming is important, yes? Clone factories would advance faster than computers. <:p_:312057780317978625>

2017-05-11 09:30:21 UTC  
2017-05-11 11:22:57 UTC  

Welcome to /leftypol/ a low-moderation channel. Feel yourself free here.

2017-05-11 11:23:33 UTC  

i'm soo glad i woke up and got the fuck out of antifa. ijs

2017-05-11 11:24:02 UTC  

Antifa is fucking retarded you better stay tf outta that shit

2017-05-11 11:24:34 UTC  

they'd hospitalise me if they knew where I'm at now

2017-05-11 11:25:35 UTC  

i didnt even know reverse lobotomies were possible. Life is good

2017-05-11 11:26:13 UTC  

don't hate, i'm just tryna bait. hail victory

2017-05-11 11:27:37 UTC  

Whats wrong with antifa?