@.... SJW are the main reason we don't have a powerful party.

Welcome to /leftypol/ a low-moderation channel. Feel yourself free here.

Hi kids.

Interesting new approach. The last people I've seen argue in that way have been Sargon of Akkad and George Orwell.

@John Doe welcome to our community.

Ty

@.... don't forget Lenin, yes?

IGP Represent

@Firefly
Aside from the politically active advocates who contributed significantly to numerous economic Revolutions throughout the world.

SJWs are pretty insignificant.

They're an obvious group, but it's been a long time since I've last seen conflict between Leftists and Communists.

@John Doe
True dat

Microaggressions are literally nothing in comparison to issues that affect the very economic foundation of society.

@Firefly Mao Zedong, good or bad?

@.... we evolve into authoritarian and anti-authoritarian branches, obviously. Time to part away from childish abominations.

@Firefly
So it's not just libertarian fascism that's accumulating on the Right to push forward an effective political strategy.

@Deleted User Mao didn't know much about theory, but maintained few correct lines and policies. Like anti-revisionism and anti-opportunism. But failed in many at the same time. I support Mao, but with a lot of but.

the fact that those two words even exist together shows how fucked up it is @....

Welcome to /leftypol/ a low-moderation channel. Feel yourself free here.

@Ladifour he is libertarian.

@Ladifour
Well, it's essentially property rights on steroids.

No, acid more like.

Haha

Welcome to /leftypol/ a low-moderation channel. Feel yourself free here.

@.... I agree. I think "microagressions" are a perfect example of how the left has gone from helping disenfranchised groups advance to using shame/guilt tactics (which ironically means they focus on the whites/straights/males rather than the groups they are supposed to be helping advance).

@Santa Claauz
I believe we'd actually make more progress on debating real issues if we just got rid of these trivial degenerates from the platform first.

Do you believe there is a difference between how the old left saw advancement of minority groups and the new "idpol"

Or is any focus on a group besides the working class just a form of idpol

Welcome to /leftypol/ a low-moderation channel. Feel yourself free here.

hey comrades

@Santa Claauz
I've noticed that there has been in fact a change. It used to be that the Left debated over the economic and moral efficacy of exclusive property claims. Now it's been hijacked by entitled edgy wannabe narcissists who care about nothing more than their ego and self-gratification.

@not_matt Welcome to our community!

thx =- )

@Santa Claauz any leftist who doesn't do economics is a fake fuck

idpol focus isn't leftism

its a social power play.

@not_matt
Preach!

@.... I think we all agree about that end.

But I'm curious what people here think about minority rights movements.

I've noticed there's a growing NazBol movement going on here which makes me curious as to the line between nationalism and "idpol"

(the flip side to that is any leftist who isn't inter sectional in opposing oppression is also wrong)

nationalism is right idpol

@not_matt that's the exact balance I'm trying to get at ^^^

Nazbol isn't growing it's a joke.