and?

He is looking for reasons. Besides banking is a tenet of Communism.

not*

both require centralised banking is what he said?

international capital and cinternational communism..aka democracy..aka catholicism lol

first 15 popes were jewish, you know that, right?

Huh? Stop being vague.

then pin me down on it

What does Third Position say about banks?

personally...in terms of actual success...i think valuing a nation's labour over credit loans is the most successful existential threat to capital ever....but that would make me a national socialist and we all know thats evil

The state in Marxism is a transitional entity. Unlike other political systems.

yeah, he was poetic

but its still bullshit

when engels invited him to actually see a mill with his own eyes...he declined lol

too busy co opting classical english anrachism, i guess

You keep on going to appeals to motive. What is it exactly about Marxist theory which is wrong?

it's a hoodwonk

wink

bakunin nailed it, i dont know what to tell you

you know marx was infamous for his pathological hatred of russians, yes?

scores.of.millions.of.russians.murdered

"Appeal to motive is a pattern of argument which consists in challenging a thesis by calling into question the motives of its proposer. It can be considered as a special case of the ad hominem circumstantial argument. As such, this type of argument may be an informal fallacy."

cults, exist. shrugs

Kołakowski seems to be mostly a sophist.

i am well aware of rhetorical devices...you are however employing such is declaring i am consistently using appeak to motive...however..i am not, i am simply imploring simplicity in viewing what i am saying

3rd cousin, centralisation.

i read marx...never mentioned rothschilds once...did internet searches for the name in his works...never comes up

why's that?

you'd think he might have mentioned them at kleast once

Why is the reason important?

wtf

Whether he did or not mention, why is it significant to his theory?

yeah, kinda...int he real world

you got sold a one oared rowboat, fam...bail and swim for it

listen Karl...name and shame..or gtfo...dont matters its your 3rd cousin, bro

You keep saying that without actually addressing any particular part. You claim, well, it is centralised therefore serves to profit jews, and that Marx was related to bankers, therefore he is complicit in plotting with them through his writings.

nah...that was bakunin

tbh, my interests lay in the proposal of synthetic utopian systems as oppose to building upon natural systems...for me....the natural patterns make far more sense than synthetic ideologies

and so much less catastrophic

That's a naturalistic fallacy. It assumes that just because things are the way they are, that is best and ought to be done. Question: do you believe in science?

if you will excuse me for a few moments, whilst i get some poisons