i'd recommend "tell the truth and shame the devil" 2015 by jewish guy gerard Menuhin...son of violinst Yehudi...he@s a very intelligent and appraochable jew..you can email him if you want

yes they did

occam's razor agrees too

soon the shops will open and i am intent on getting fkng wasted today. totally pirate drunk

Now the criticism of Marxism from the Bakunin quotes says that Communism is jewish because it has a central bank. In that argument, any bank is a jewish construction.

nah..thats not a solid logical prgression...what he said is just what he said...you extrapolate on it fallaciosuly

forgiv spelling...already started on getting wasted

"What can there be in common between Communism and the large banks?"

and?

He is looking for reasons. Besides banking is a tenet of Communism.

not*

both require centralised banking is what he said?

international capital and cinternational communism..aka democracy..aka catholicism lol

first 15 popes were jewish, you know that, right?

Huh? Stop being vague.

then pin me down on it

What does Third Position say about banks?

personally...in terms of actual success...i think valuing a nation's labour over credit loans is the most successful existential threat to capital ever....but that would make me a national socialist and we all know thats evil

The state in Marxism is a transitional entity. Unlike other political systems.

yeah, he was poetic

but its still bullshit

when engels invited him to actually see a mill with his own eyes...he declined lol

too busy co opting classical english anrachism, i guess

You keep on going to appeals to motive. What is it exactly about Marxist theory which is wrong?

it's a hoodwonk

wink

bakunin nailed it, i dont know what to tell you

you know marx was infamous for his pathological hatred of russians, yes?

scores.of.millions.of.russians.murdered

"Appeal to motive is a pattern of argument which consists in challenging a thesis by calling into question the motives of its proposer. It can be considered as a special case of the ad hominem circumstantial argument. As such, this type of argument may be an informal fallacy."

cults, exist. shrugs

Kołakowski seems to be mostly a sophist.

i am well aware of rhetorical devices...you are however employing such is declaring i am consistently using appeak to motive...however..i am not, i am simply imploring simplicity in viewing what i am saying

3rd cousin, centralisation.

i read marx...never mentioned rothschilds once...did internet searches for the name in his works...never comes up

why's that?

you'd think he might have mentioned them at kleast once

Why is the reason important?

wtf

Whether he did or not mention, why is it significant to his theory?

yeah, kinda...int he real world