Message from @slack
Discord ID: 313913830507937795
this is more interesting...The Third Position or Third Alternative is a political position that emphasizes opposition to both communism and capitalism. Advocates of Third Position politics typically present themselves as "beyond left and right", while syncretizing ideas from each end of the political spectrum, usually reactionary right-wing cultural views and radical left-wing economic views.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7]
Third Positionists often seek alliances with separatists of ethnicities and races other than their own, with the goal of achieving peaceful ethnic and racial coexistence, a form of segregation emphasizing self-determination and preservation of cultural differences. They support national liberation movements in the least-developed countries, and have recently embraced environmentalism.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7]
The Third Position does not resolve the problem.
Is Israel a Thrid Positionist state?
now, i have a day off today and i want to get fucking wasted...we could talk about straussian economics if you like...i dont mean the neocohen..i mean the left wing national socialist
isreal is nothing at all to do with 3rd position... isreal is an exclusive ethno state that prohibits all other ethno states
idi amin was only a cannibal after he fell out with isreal
best not to talk about OPs and 911...i mean, its pretty clear when you work it out, but if you havent disseminated the data..it just ssems outrageous to you and offensive, probably
I know Israel did 9/11.
i'd recommend "tell the truth and shame the devil" 2015 by jewish guy gerard Menuhin...son of violinst Yehudi...he@s a very intelligent and appraochable jew..you can email him if you want
yes they did
occam's razor agrees too
soon the shops will open and i am intent on getting fkng wasted today. totally pirate drunk
Now the criticism of Marxism from the Bakunin quotes says that Communism is jewish because it has a central bank. In that argument, any bank is a jewish construction.
nah..thats not a solid logical prgression...what he said is just what he said...you extrapolate on it fallaciosuly
forgiv spelling...already started on getting wasted
"What can there be in common between Communism and the large banks?"
and?
He is looking for reasons. Besides banking is a tenet of Communism.
not*
both require centralised banking is what he said?
first 15 popes were jewish, you know that, right?
Huh? Stop being vague.
then pin me down on it
What does Third Position say about banks?
personally...in terms of actual success...i think valuing a nation's labour over credit loans is the most successful existential threat to capital ever....but that would make me a national socialist and we all know thats evil
The state in Marxism is a transitional entity. Unlike other political systems.
yeah, he was poetic
but its still bullshit
when engels invited him to actually see a mill with his own eyes...he declined lol
too busy co opting classical english anrachism, i guess
You keep on going to appeals to motive. What is it exactly about Marxist theory which is wrong?
it's a hoodwonk
wink
bakunin nailed it, i dont know what to tell you
you know marx was infamous for his pathological hatred of russians, yes?
scores.of.millions.of.russians.murdered
"Appeal to motive is a pattern of argument which consists in challenging a thesis by calling into question the motives of its proposer. It can be considered as a special case of the ad hominem circumstantial argument. As such, this type of argument may be an informal fallacy."
cults, exist. shrugs
KoĊakowski seems to be mostly a sophist.
i am well aware of rhetorical devices...you are however employing such is declaring i am consistently using appeak to motive...however..i am not, i am simply imploring simplicity in viewing what i am saying