is good

fascists too

thats about it

thats class

tho

trips to the gulag to the bourgeois

for only $19.17 per person

*a third worldist whines because they have better conditions*

first class bourgeois gulag cells for only$19.45

fyre festival style

love me

no u

*kisses*

I have a question: would we be considered bourgeoisie or is that a term used for people that employ workers?

bouregoise is the rich middle class which owns businesses or corperations

having a lot of money as a middle class worker doesnt really fit the position of bouregoise

Ok

What do you guys think about financial analysts or people that work in finance?

my ma is not bourgeoise even though she is a banker and has associates working under her because she worked her way to the position under a boss

which she still does

So what you're saying is that as long as there is someone above you, you can't be a bourgeoisie?

Workers don't exploit anyone

They aren't extracting surplus value from other workers, they don't own the business

If something they could receive wages from other workers, passed from the bourgeoisie; that's called the labour aristocracy

What about a financial analyst that gambles the savings of others or bets on the livelihoods of others?

probably labour aristocracy

but speculation?

Some marxist economists consider it another for of exploitation

but they aren't owning other workers

I feel bad now because I might study finance in school

https://www.marxists.org/glossary/terms/b/o.htm

No

Other person would do otherwise

a society can't be changed voluntarily by studying this or not

as i understand it

if you own MOP and hire people, you are bourgeoisie

you dont own MOP and work for wage, you are proletarian

yes

but there are labour aristocracy analysis, and maoist third worldists

bourgeois can be big, medium, very big (etc) or petit bourgeoisie

petit bourgeoisie is bourgeoisie that owns MOP, hire people but doesnt extract enough surplus value because it owns few MOP and he has to work himself