just a wage slave, exploited under the law

and if that worker doesn't meets what the bourgeois wants; the worker is in the street

In fact, without usury or its associated mechanisms, exploitation should reach tolerable levels.

we'd need unions to keep that

Amazingly low.

Also without usury a volunteer economy may emerge

market distortion isn't only from usury

Unions are mafias which exploit the worker.

the nature of an unplanned economy leads to distortion, rewarding or not innovation, the same market (anarchy of production)

Usury is the lions share of market distortion, consider its ripple effects.

I agree, but vertical mafias endowed in the state; those kind of unions

The products the originate from usury being allowed in the system

not the anarchist ones

anarcho-syndicalism is free from parasitism for the worker

they're horizontal

You know anarcho-syndicalism is the system used by multi-national corporations at the elite level.

It works like a motherfucker.

Requires a ton of resources to keep the hounds off ur ass.

Multi national corporations can't be unions

they exploit the worker

lol keep going guys

Hehehe. Not for the Exploited no

ah like google

The system looks very different depending on your caste

I've been through many many castes.

that's not anarcho-syndicalism; in this case the productivity for the programmers leads to profit

some works need scientific management like retail for capital

but in this case, they adopt other model

You're still thinking in worker terms.

most anarchist societies had governments

other than the maknovists

Same way Cuba was not very socialist, but anti-imperialist.

The perspective from a vested party is pure anarcho-syndicalism.

cuba was socialist lol

cuba is a great example of socialism

@petit bourgeois it can't

The stock market is a proxy for competition between these syndicates

Parties are hierarchical

stock market won't be in a syndicate society

@petit bourgeois Cuba doesn't have economy to be socialist

explain please