Message from @petit bourgeois
Discord ID: 314547889240276994
That frees the proles to pursue self-sufficiency which is the only defense against wage-cuckery
the usury is just one form
Yes well it's the most harmful form
Gotta start somewhere.
seizing the means and setting a central planned economy is going directly to the root of the problem
Ehhh
It's like you don't wanna win.
worked for the soviets
but that economy requires a grade of self-sufficiency
and the chinese
like the USSR
Lmao death cult
I wanna win
i wanna win 2
If you wanna win, fight usury
that too
Focus on that
ill win by beating the fuck out of my dick
all exploitation
No, that's autism
@Deleted User Subjectivity can equal objectivity in our case. Even very poor and not well studied. The theory brings us closer even if not too much. One who fights imperialism all his life is an anti-imperialist. USSR was more anti-imperialist than anybody else in history.
The worst exploitation is usury
the worker I told you about doesn't invest
just a wage slave, exploited under the law
and if that worker doesn't meets what the bourgeois wants; the worker is in the street
In fact, without usury or its associated mechanisms, exploitation should reach tolerable levels.
we'd need unions to keep that
Amazingly low.
Also without usury a volunteer economy may emerge
market distortion isn't only from usury
Unions are mafias which exploit the worker.
the nature of an unplanned economy leads to distortion, rewarding or not innovation, the same market (anarchy of production)
Usury is the lions share of market distortion, consider its ripple effects.
I agree, but vertical mafias endowed in the state; those kind of unions
The products the originate from usury being allowed in the system
not the anarchist ones
anarcho-syndicalism is free from parasitism for the worker
they're horizontal
You know anarcho-syndicalism is the system used by multi-national corporations at the elite level.
It works like a motherfucker.