Which country are you in idk the context of your political systems

all the right wants to keep capitalism going on

reformists in the left want it too

(socdems)

Removing capitalism is a non-starter

Remove usury

That frees the proles to pursue self-sufficiency which is the only defense against wage-cuckery

the usury is just one form

Yes well it's the most harmful form

Gotta start somewhere.

seizing the means and setting a central planned economy is going directly to the root of the problem

Ehhh

It's like you don't wanna win.

worked for the soviets

but that economy requires a grade of self-sufficiency

and the chinese

like the USSR

Lmao death cult

I wanna win

i wanna win 2

If you wanna win, fight usury

that too

Focus on that

ill win by beating the fuck out of my dick

all exploitation

No, that's autism

heck

@Deleted User Subjectivity can equal objectivity in our case. Even very poor and not well studied. The theory brings us closer even if not too much. One who fights imperialism all his life is an anti-imperialist. USSR was more anti-imperialist than anybody else in history.

The worst exploitation is usury

the worker I told you about doesn't invest

just a wage slave, exploited under the law

and if that worker doesn't meets what the bourgeois wants; the worker is in the street

In fact, without usury or its associated mechanisms, exploitation should reach tolerable levels.

we'd need unions to keep that

Amazingly low.

Also without usury a volunteer economy may emerge

market distortion isn't only from usury

Unions are mafias which exploit the worker.

the nature of an unplanned economy leads to distortion, rewarding or not innovation, the same market (anarchy of production)

Usury is the lions share of market distortion, consider its ripple effects.

I agree, but vertical mafias endowed in the state; those kind of unions