No, because his economy is capitalist period

you can't be for the workers that way

Do you believe that eliminating an aristocracy and reforming it under different people means it is destroyed?

>hitler wasn't for the workers
>NSDAP Germany wasn't for the workers

hitler specially in the NSDAP wasn't for the workers, removing the strasserists for example

Are you anti-Semitic?

no

Then why do you support Strasser?

I don't

I say that they eliminated the ""left-wing"" of the party

The brownshirts were those who trashed Jewish businesses and properties and assaulted Jews

Ah, that conspiracy

>THAT conspiracy

You think the riots didn't happen?

It comes from the ignorance of Europe, the catholics couldn't lend money but the jews could do it

so let's hate the jew

The brownshirts are a figment of historians' imaginations?

mussolini had jews in his cabinet

So did Hitler

but even banning lending isn't enough, you have to expropriate all the capitalists

or a new elite, jew or not emerges again

So does this mean that the NSDAP or Italians blindly hated people for their origins?

religion or genetics doesn't determine social class

Nepotism does, hence the disproportion of Jewish wealth that we see even today

From far antiquity

Certain families passed wealth down

Some had become the bourgeois of modern day you so despise

that's just a part of the problem

you're not going to the root of the problem eliminating jews

I despise as well, not for Jewish blood but for a lack of virtue

Oh, THAT conspiracy again

>eliminating Jews

yes, or the big capitalists

if you let the little bourgeois, they'll become the new big ones

If you eliminate both, then who fills the gap?

the workers

all for the workers

If an ASSEMBLY eliminates them, who fills the gap?

Does the mob have a leader?

they can have delegates or party

Was Lenin on the front line during the skirmishes between the reds and the whites?