The brownshirts are a figment of historians' imaginations?

mussolini had jews in his cabinet

So did Hitler

but even banning lending isn't enough, you have to expropriate all the capitalists

or a new elite, jew or not emerges again

So does this mean that the NSDAP or Italians blindly hated people for their origins?

religion or genetics doesn't determine social class

Nepotism does, hence the disproportion of Jewish wealth that we see even today

From far antiquity

Certain families passed wealth down

Some had become the bourgeois of modern day you so despise

that's just a part of the problem

you're not going to the root of the problem eliminating jews

I despise as well, not for Jewish blood but for a lack of virtue

Oh, THAT conspiracy again

>eliminating Jews

yes, or the big capitalists

if you let the little bourgeois, they'll become the new big ones

If you eliminate both, then who fills the gap?

the workers

all for the workers

If an ASSEMBLY eliminates them, who fills the gap?

Does the mob have a leader?

they can have delegates or party

Was Lenin on the front line during the skirmishes between the reds and the whites?

yes but the history is done by the masses

there wasn't only a voice too

History is done by those who write, and write do the aristocrats. We then come full circle

no, the masses do the actions; we're materialists

and I said, all for the workers

@Deleted User @Blebleh would be fun to hear both of you in voice chat.

not the bourgeoisie extracting surplus value from the workers

but a planned economy for the workers

There's a fallacy where either you must be in the mob, or in the tower. But in the end the tower doesn't crumble and the mob only settles their implements of harvest

>planned economy

And who plans the economy?

The workers? The people?

yes

Through popular voicing?

soviets

@Deleted User or communist authority.