@Ladifour meow

"I must say in all conscience, comrades, that I do
not deserve a good half of the flattering things that
have been said here about me. I am, it appears, a hero
of the October Revolution, the leader of the Communist
Party of the Soviet Union, the leader of the Communist
International, a legendary warrior-knight and all the
rest of it. That is absurd, comrades, and quite unneces-
sary exaggeration. It is the sort of thing that is usually
said at the graveside of a departed revolutionary. But
I have no intention of dying yet.
I must therefore give a true picture of what I was
formerly, and to whom I owe my present position in
our Party.
Comrade Arakel* said here that in the old days he
regarded himself as one of my teachers, and myself as
his pupil. That is perfectly true, comrades. I really
was, and still am, one of the pupils of the advanced
workers of the Tiflis railway workshops"

http://www.marx2mao.com/PDFs/StWorks8.pdf page 204

goodbye

>gripes about the social-democrats in the first few pages

Even Stalin hated them

Also I C E P I C K

@Deleted User Social-Democracy is a national-socialism in the first stage.

Has nothing to do with Marxism anymore.

That is a complete and utter untruth my friend

Social Democracy was one of the things National Socialists formed to oppose

In fact it was the very first movement Hitler was introduced to

That is what Marxist theory came to. At first it was an opposition but after Social-Democrats joined NatSoc

He even remarked it had strayed far from anything it ever could have been to begin with

And had taken the unions with it

Social Democrats may have *converted* but National Socialism and Social Democracy are two wildly different systems

If they were able to convert something is wrong there. Marxists do not convert.

They are logical, rational.

Humans are infallible.

As I have said before, you really ought to read Mein Kampf. Second and third chapters heavily involve criticisms of SocDem and why it was bunkum in his opinion

If I recall correctly it was mostly because the movement was driven by non-workers, much like many such movements

Hmmm

@Deleted User Social-Democrats turned NatSoc. Marxist fought them in the war.

Now we are against SocDems

Individuals, not Social-Democracy and its rotten structure

The structure makes the prone. The lack of theory and structure too.

And you must understand, many National Socialists WERE Marxist leaning, what was disavowed were Marxists themselves rather than Marx's philosophies

So they turn

SocDems are Fascist babies.

You do not even know what fascism is

Actually, no, I skipped ahead

Define fascism

@Deleted User Show me your amazing script of propaganda

Yours first my friend

I have none.

Never used it. I made few for other people

So you claim that Socdems are fascist yet you do not know what a fascist is?

I would really like to talk about Stalinism.

instead

I do not mean to condescend, I am no more wiser on certain subjects