@Blebleh Cultural Stalinism is the true way

@Deleted User his parents produce.

@Deleted User Something stolen from his family is something stolen from him.

@Deleted User I don't know him. I'm here first time.

What is the difference?

@Deleted User I don't have a personal problem with capitalism. But I'm Marxist

I'm also petite-bourgeois

By objective class

@Deleted User From my family.

@Deleted User Now it is my wealth

@Deleted User yes

Lenin was an aristocrat, Engels managed his own fabrics.

@Deleted User Only revolution can bring communism.

If aristocrat is on the side of proletariat its all good.

He infiltrated factories working in them.

He didn't have an income from capital.

He is of class proletariat.

@Deleted User Officials work for the class.

@Ladifour meow

@Deleted User Social-Democracy is a national-socialism in the first stage.

Has nothing to do with Marxism anymore.

That is what Marxist theory came to. At first it was an opposition but after Social-Democrats joined NatSoc

If they were able to convert something is wrong there. Marxists do not convert.

They are logical, rational.

@Deleted User Social-Democrats turned NatSoc. Marxist fought them in the war.

Now we are against SocDems

The structure makes the prone. The lack of theory and structure too.

So they turn

SocDems are Fascist babies.

@Deleted User Show me your amazing script of propaganda

I have none.

Never used it. I made few for other people

I would really like to talk about Stalinism.

instead

National-Socialism can work only under Marxist authority.

It was beaten up by Marxists