You are assuming an unprecedented scenario, where every person is a genius of equal intellect.

Let's say that people can do basic math

if it's too advanced, the best minds could explain it to the people

in a way they can decide

politics has values

Assuming this were possible, why bother if the outcome will be the same because there is only 1 correct answer, objectively.

Sure, educate people to the best of our ability, but do not, yet, rely on them to make the correct decision.

because if for some reason the delegate isn't doing what we agreed, we can overthrow that person violently or legally

it avoids "revisionism"

otherwise the delegates have a spirit for themselves

Why not just point to the incorrect teaching?

yes, but who will point it out and who will listen?

The authority will point it out with intellectual reasoning. And if they are corrupt, then the contradictions can be easily pointed out.

the authority is the corruptible one

the contradictions aren't so easiliy pointed out

see Khruschev

there can be protestors but the people when they don't know the problems could ignore it

and let them pass

The majority is incorruptible?

the people has to decide the fate

they're not the ones who can be corrupted

If an authority works against the interests of the collective, objectively, then there may be grounds for new revolution, because they have become the new bourgeoisie.

It is inevitable.

people don't notice it when they don't know about it

this is happening in every country now

and I don't see how the USSR prevented this; a few people may realize it

What are you talking about? Don't you agree that socialism is inevitable?

yes but it needs class consciousness

and organization

even more, we need to be careful when we have a capitalist bloc that is our enemy

So how is it going to happen do you think? There are going to be revolutionary forces. Which is also why there should be a Vanguard.

the platform in combination with the anarchist unions have to improve the consciousness of the people and act

When a socialist authority gets corrupt, it becomes bourgeoisie. And a new dialectic begins.

we could add a party too, but as an extension

they don't have to become the bourgeoisie to be corrupt

@Blebleh What have anarchists unions achieved? They are hamstrung by their superstitious notions of 'consensus' and 'democracy'.

it could be just undermining the socialist roots or not making the decisions agreed by the people

they've achieved 8 labour hours in Spain

with a general strike

the IWW while not pure anarchist, the organization I think it's and it's big