yes, but who will point it out and who will listen?

The authority will point it out with intellectual reasoning. And if they are corrupt, then the contradictions can be easily pointed out.

the authority is the corruptible one

the contradictions aren't so easiliy pointed out

see Khruschev

there can be protestors but the people when they don't know the problems could ignore it

and let them pass

The majority is incorruptible?

the people has to decide the fate

they're not the ones who can be corrupted

If an authority works against the interests of the collective, objectively, then there may be grounds for new revolution, because they have become the new bourgeoisie.

It is inevitable.

people don't notice it when they don't know about it

this is happening in every country now

and I don't see how the USSR prevented this; a few people may realize it

What are you talking about? Don't you agree that socialism is inevitable?

yes but it needs class consciousness

and organization

even more, we need to be careful when we have a capitalist bloc that is our enemy

So how is it going to happen do you think? There are going to be revolutionary forces. Which is also why there should be a Vanguard.

the platform in combination with the anarchist unions have to improve the consciousness of the people and act

When a socialist authority gets corrupt, it becomes bourgeoisie. And a new dialectic begins.

we could add a party too, but as an extension

they don't have to become the bourgeoisie to be corrupt

@Blebleh What have anarchists unions achieved? They are hamstrung by their superstitious notions of 'consensus' and 'democracy'.

it could be just undermining the socialist roots or not making the decisions agreed by the people

they've achieved 8 labour hours in Spain

with a general strike

the IWW while not pure anarchist, the organization I think it's and it's big

this is all to improve conditions for the worker and also get a consciousness for the revolution

and as I said, in the USSR before the party, there were councils

@Blebleh A dictatorship of the proletariat that betrays the interests of the collective is a contradiction. Either the Party is objectively proletariat or they are revisionist traitors. Class consciousness will win in the end.

it looked more like an anarchist federation

a prole can be traitor to his class

@Blebleh In there beginning there were councils, but this was abandoned because it was childish and ineffectual for revolutionary purposes.

what lenin says

Lenin was wrong?

probably in this

A prole who is a traitor is not a prole, but an agent of the bourgeoisie.

@Blebleh Councils are limited to reformism. Revolution is exclusively the business of the Vanguard.

a prole can be an agent of the bourgeoisie, declasé