You're not meant to ever understand.

Is there anything else that's not private ownership or worker ownership? Show us

Legitimately interested in this

Well, I guess primitivism is no ownership at all

But that's a bit irrelevant

"Worker ownership" there you go. You've limited the scope of discussion with a concept custom to the slave religion.

THATS NOW HOW YOU ESCAPE

Ok, communal ownership

honestly I don't know how you escape.

I'm just glad I'm past that margin of intelligence which gets stuck in goytraps like this.

Whatever that doesn't involve the law of value, exploitation and/or accumulation of capital

You said there was a third option. Articulate it now or concede this point.

Show us

There are many of them, BDSM follows a simple vein.

Similar

Hey, OF

Don't get lost while jerking off to your image in the mirror

Tell us what's the third option

I concede fully, the goal here isn't to enlighten the Hegelian untermensch

You go ahead and be "correct"

So, no third option

Got it.

Now. Remember. We got to this retarded nadir from the one dimensional political spectrum

This is the function of the reductive logic of diamat

Total dissolution of challenging narratives into shit like this.

It would totally work if I was in that sub-130 range

I'm not sub-130

Doesn't mean that I'm educated or that I have to be arrogant

Sure

Basically, what you are doing right now

Is wasting my time demoralizing socialism

What better hobby could I have.

Reading theory to understand what you're critizicing before doing it

That's a good start

Mr "Socialism is basically diamat and nothing else"

So sayeth those who cannot understand.

>total dissolution of challenging narrative
>doesn't elaborate on his revolutionary new political paradigm
Special snowflake much?

You cannot explain your doctrine. This means you don't understand it.

Special snowflakes at least have something to add, a new perspective

It is not to me to explain your doctrine.

This is just mental masturbation of the self