Message from @OF-8
Discord ID: 316751181210845184
oh lord this video is actually p good
I have started reading 'Fundamentals of Marxism-Leninism'. I have to say that this political literature is more advanced than anything I have seen to be produced under the cause of the Right.
Well yeah. It's got that veneer of goy herding slave religion.
Plus you're still under this retarded assumption that politics can be divided up into two sides.
yes we are all mini stalins.
Temporarily inconvenienced stalins.
🚁
At this stage there are two sides to politics. Private ownership and public ownership. What is the third option, no ownership? <:troll:312064734113431553> Well, you do not need politics for that, so it's not a third side.
wham
Lmfao
I stand in awe of the craft involved in persuading you to think this way.
It's such an elegant way of manipulating the marginally intelligent and giving them a grand goal of absolute destruction.
And that's how death cults work.
You're not meant to ever understand.
Is there anything else that's not private ownership or worker ownership? Show us
Legitimately interested in this
Well, I guess primitivism is no ownership at all
But that's a bit irrelevant
"Worker ownership" there you go. You've limited the scope of discussion with a concept custom to the slave religion.
Ok, communal ownership
honestly I don't know how you escape.
I'm just glad I'm past that margin of intelligence which gets stuck in goytraps like this.
Whatever that doesn't involve the law of value, exploitation and/or accumulation of capital
You said there was a third option. Articulate it now or concede this point.
Show us
There are many of them, BDSM follows a simple vein.
Similar
Hey, OF
Don't get lost while jerking off to your image in the mirror
Tell us what's the third option
I concede fully, the goal here isn't to enlighten the Hegelian untermensch
You go ahead and be "correct"
So, no third option
Got it.
Now. Remember. We got to this retarded nadir from the one dimensional political spectrum
This is the function of the reductive logic of diamat
Total dissolution of challenging narratives into shit like this.
It would totally work if I was in that sub-130 range
I'm not sub-130