https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p9OyYMsvvw4

like, precisely the same

>recognizing that capitalism is inherently exploiting you makes you a slave to it

???

uh

@OF-8 If you want individual realisation, should it be at the expense of others, or should all people be able to self-realise?

lmao

Yep, the only difference is that behind my claims there is analysis and fact, behind your, only ideology and bourgeois influence

wether my realization consumes the lifeblood or material essence of others is not my decision

Exploitation is entropy, entropy is the universe.

oh my god

Aint no materialism gonna tell u that

you are pure ideology

^ thats the joke

you are ideology that has become self-aware and manifested itself into a person

Also, as Skittles said, telling an anti-capitalist that he supports capital indirectly is an impressive exercise of mental gymnastics

lmfao

ITS CALLED LOGOS

SOCIALISTS HATE IT

^_^

>socialists hate logos

You mean Jesus?

>the guy who doesn't use facts and bases his ideology around his personal feelings says that

You don't even understand what logos means

We're from two different worlds intellectually speaking

you think yours is the only one

Truth is not relative.

No, I think mine is the better one based on analysis

You, basically, don't know any other world

Tell me you don't mean Jesus or Jung.

http://imgur.com/vR1FinG

I fully disagree based on practical application of socialist policies

Which is the perfect example of, again, cultural hegemony: not being able to conceive societies that are outside the norm

we got data on this madness

Hey, what do communists think about social programs in the EU

I mean

you didnt want to believe the 5.3% GDP Growth/full employment for two decades under Stalin that was during the Great Depression while capitalists had 1 in 4 people unemployed and economic ruin

You hardly know anything about the implementation of socialism, and when shown proof you react saying that "you don't care about facts"

They kind of avoided the Great Depression because they were not economically connected with most of the world

@Sorghagtani Beki Precisely.

I don't think Stalin is a good example for socialists to refer to