Do you think this is sustainable?

Sure.

It will stabilise.

@Sorghagtani Beki yesterday you were against this server.

I have had many leftist friends talk to me about how they do not think this server will live, and many people who are still unsure if this server is yet alive

so much caring today.

That's nice.

This server might as well be considered dead, unless you believe the current activity and the rate at which people are leaving is acceptable

@Ashly Very bad concern trolling, kid thinks he is a mastermind though.

>900 pings

Didn't the man with a water picture as his profile picture leave as well?

What

Oh people must have spammed

Ah, perfect. Now you will play me off as trolling, as you crawl back into your pit of inaction

There are 2 possibilities

>people do not think this server will live

1) You want the server to die

There is nothing to act upon

2) you are stupid

Come up with a solution idiot

@Deleted User most people are soft-hearted and it will influence them to the degree. He is doing a good job.

@Sorghagtani Beki

The solution is to instate a link limit for each chat entree. Only one picture per chat entree.

Now, this will not prevent spam in entirety, but it will paralyze the effectiveness of it until the spammers are banned

How does that stop people from leaving

As well as this, it slows down the rate at which spam is given

The problem is low pop not spammers, spammers can be dealth with easily

There is no saying that it does, but it will certainly negate the level of spam

Holy shit

As well as this, people must be tagged before they can speak

Why is it so active

So your problem isn't the low pop you were talking about it's the spam?

@r i n n e r Some fags spammed @everyone

No, my problem is with both. Because spam is creating this low pop.

Ah

@r i n n e r It's the revolution, kid.

Leftypol unofficial requires tags, the anarchist capitalist chat requires tags

Why do we not require tags?

Tags are retarded

Both of their servers have chat levels exponentially higher than ours

Vetting is less retarded