Message from @dindins

Discord ID: 318643578333036556


2017-05-29 06:50:54 UTC  

What is this "higher stage"

2017-05-29 06:51:18 UTC  

Scroll up. It is economic emancipation and freedom from exploitation.

2017-05-29 06:51:33 UTC  

Define freedom

2017-05-29 06:51:59 UTC  

I've heard a myriad of descriptions from
>NOT CAPITALISM
to
>mutual anarchaic collectivism

2017-05-29 06:52:00 UTC  

I can just as easily save up money and start a business as most everyone else, that's not exploitation.

2017-05-29 06:52:03 UTC  

From each according to his ability, to each according to his need

2017-05-29 06:52:07 UTC  

@Deleted User I said 'freedom from' as in, absence from oppressive force of

2017-05-29 06:52:19 UTC  

@Aidan Oy vey stop being such a national socialist!

2017-05-29 06:52:34 UTC  

Exploitation is stealing the surplus labor of working people. also lol

2017-05-29 06:52:42 UTC  

And who owns the means of production?

2017-05-29 06:52:53 UTC  

If I own a business and hire people am I exploiting them?

2017-05-29 06:52:57 UTC  

yes

2017-05-29 06:52:59 UTC  

@Deleted User The proletariat, which becomes everyone.

2017-05-29 06:53:04 UTC  

How so?

2017-05-29 06:54:20 UTC  

So do you consider any commune that has existed communist?

2017-05-29 06:54:56 UTC  

You are stealing their surplus labor value. That is, the worth of the labor they produce is what you would profit from, yet you require them to create wealth. You steal their labor, and contribute nothing to it

2017-05-29 06:55:11 UTC  

@Deleted User No. Only USSR up until Khrushchev then there was revisionism and decline.

2017-05-29 06:55:17 UTC  

That sounds like an unjust trade rather than thievery

2017-05-29 06:55:32 UTC  

Maybe Albania and a few others.

2017-05-29 06:55:36 UTC  

How am I stealing it? If they voluntarily agree to work for me knowing the parameters of them working for me how is that wrong?

2017-05-29 06:55:49 UTC  

>voluntarily

2017-05-29 06:55:54 UTC  

>USSR up to Kruschev
You consider THAT a dictatorship of the proletariat?

2017-05-29 06:56:09 UTC  

If I'm not forcing them to then its voluntary they don

2017-05-29 06:56:12 UTC  

It's not voluntary. They need money to survive

2017-05-29 06:56:15 UTC  

@Deleted User All successful Socialist states follow the Soviet model, Marxist-Leninism

2017-05-29 06:56:18 UTC  

have to choose me

2017-05-29 06:56:24 UTC  

@Deleted User Yes, the best model of it.

2017-05-29 06:56:29 UTC  

The question as to whether one is forced to take up a job or not is a red herring always

2017-05-29 06:56:34 UTC  

^^

2017-05-29 06:56:35 UTC  

Communists fall for it the most

2017-05-29 06:56:41 UTC  

And just did

2017-05-29 06:56:52 UTC  

They don't last though, they stagnate and collapse. @Deleted User

2017-05-29 06:57:29 UTC  

ill take a step back here then, let you guys handle this

2017-05-29 06:57:32 UTC  

@Deleted User Lasted long enough to transform USSR into a superpower, oh, and that's after crushing 80% of the Wehrmacht.

2017-05-29 06:58:09 UTC  

It still didn't even last into the 21st century, in the end it failed.

2017-05-29 06:58:10 UTC  

If you don't work you go to Gulag.

2017-05-29 06:58:26 UTC  

@Deleted User
>The USSR
>A successful SOCIALIST state
There were classes, there were bourgeois.
The government officials and the bureaucrats were elevated/venerated in that society, not the workers. The workers were at most nominally appreciated yet they were treated poorly especially in the beginning.

2017-05-29 06:58:37 UTC  

I would just say you don't eat and save the resources but whatever. @Deleted User

2017-05-29 06:58:45 UTC  

the ussr is not some infallible thing

2017-05-29 06:58:53 UTC  

@Deleted User So? This is just the beginning. The Battering Ram has just reached the gates. Communist theory is ongoing.

2017-05-29 06:59:25 UTC  

It has failed, Communism is in decline while Fascism is on the rise the future power is clear.