always.

In the end, no dictator, no terrorists!

What's the problem?

10 people just died in baghdad, yesterday m8

from an is terror attack

And under Saddam hundreds may have died this past month!

What is better?

"may have"

saddam was at least secular

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dujail_Massacre

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halabja_chemical_attack

Is it right to FORCE the Iraqs to live under this tyrant!

I would NEVER be content!

Now, in Iraq I have weakened terrorists, who will only continue to be weakened, and no dictator!

Hoorah!

i still know you're trolling

but im gonna keep going

because im a sadist

I'm not!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halabja_chemical_attack

you aren't being critical enough

the suppression and murder by a dictator isn't solved by putting new people at the top of the power structures

its eliminating power structures as such

you can't knock the top off a pyramid and expect the whole thing to change

Is Iraq a dictatorship now?

No!

i never said so fam

@not_matt WOuld you rather live in modern day iraq or saddam era iraq?

Depression ^

saddam killed 250,000 iraqis

sanctions against iraq killed 576,000 children, alone.

in attempting to solve the problem, we made it worse

How many would have died if Saddam continued to live on