@OF-8 Actually, I am struggling right now with Aquina's First Mover argument.

Let me take a look at it.

Because atheism is a sick beleif that what just is, is not. That what we all have felt for ages is just insanity, that the costant flow in the belief of the God and his son is just a random happening.

@OF-8 Here http://dhspriory.org/thomas/Compendium.htm#3

I cannot refute it.

Atheism is lack of belief

Antitheism is other thing

Yeah, not.

You're talking about agostic atheism.

And it's your belief that we're felt for ages

we can think that it was a natural course for example

or not believing because we don't want to cede authority to a book or priest

Not toa book or priest

but to God.

Most of the Bible are modern law from God.

Holy fuckin scroll of text

Pretty much.

I don't believe in abrahamic gods, in a strong way that I'm sure

@OF-8 You only have to read CHAPTER 3

THE EXISTENCE OF GOD

Got it.

One paragraph.

but other things, other "it-could-be" I don't know for sure

but I don't want to believe in anything, it could be there's a pony in the moon

Done.

>God is not real because of my personal and secular morals disagree with it

no

I rejected it because it was contradictory

Ok so as I see it this is like me saying. "God poked a quark and now you're here"

And also, if a book based on belief messed with these things; I'd reject it too

Well. Yeah. Can't argue against it really and why try?

otherwise I'm just ceding blind authority

It's annoying

It's time. Bro.

It's saying that time is an affect of god.

It's called faith for a reason.

@OF-8 Yes, time and motion.

You can kinda run with that logically.

exactly, but corruptible and blind faith

I reject those faiths

See I think motion is just a device to illustrate time.

Here in this paragraph.