Message from @Anglican

Discord ID: 322543970024423426


2017-06-09 01:11:34 UTC  

Most of the Bible are modern law from God.

2017-06-09 01:11:37 UTC  

Holy fuckin scroll of text

2017-06-09 01:11:51 UTC  

Pretty much.

2017-06-09 01:11:54 UTC  

I don't believe in abrahamic gods, in a strong way that I'm sure

2017-06-09 01:12:00 UTC  

@OF-8 You only have to read CHAPTER 3

THE EXISTENCE OF GOD

2017-06-09 01:12:07 UTC  

Got it.

2017-06-09 01:12:08 UTC  

One paragraph.

2017-06-09 01:12:20 UTC  

but other things, other "it-could-be" I don't know for sure

2017-06-09 01:12:34 UTC  

but I don't want to believe in anything, it could be there's a pony in the moon

2017-06-09 01:12:42 UTC  

Done.

2017-06-09 01:13:14 UTC  

>God is not real because of my personal and secular morals disagree with it

2017-06-09 01:13:21 UTC  

no

2017-06-09 01:13:32 UTC  

I rejected it because it was contradictory

2017-06-09 01:13:33 UTC  

Ok so as I see it this is like me saying. "God poked a quark and now you're here"

2017-06-09 01:13:49 UTC  

And also, if a book based on belief messed with these things; I'd reject it too

2017-06-09 01:13:53 UTC  

Well. Yeah. Can't argue against it really and why try?

2017-06-09 01:13:58 UTC  

otherwise I'm just ceding blind authority

2017-06-09 01:14:06 UTC  

It's annoying

2017-06-09 01:14:22 UTC  

It's time. Bro.

2017-06-09 01:14:34 UTC  

It's saying that time is an affect of god.

2017-06-09 01:14:35 UTC  

It's called faith for a reason.

2017-06-09 01:14:47 UTC  

@OF-8 Yes, time and motion.

2017-06-09 01:14:47 UTC  

You can kinda run with that logically.

2017-06-09 01:14:51 UTC  

exactly, but corruptible and blind faith

2017-06-09 01:15:03 UTC  

I reject those faiths

2017-06-09 01:15:15 UTC  

See I think motion is just a device to illustrate time.

2017-06-09 01:15:20 UTC  

Here in this paragraph.

2017-06-09 01:15:27 UTC  

Sure.

2017-06-09 01:15:27 UTC  

It can be used for control easily

2017-06-09 01:15:42 UTC  

So you'd oppress other people just for beliefs

2017-06-09 01:15:49 UTC  

hitler was a good man

2017-06-09 01:15:51 UTC  

in religion?

2017-06-09 01:15:58 UTC  

dont dare oppress me

2017-06-09 01:16:07 UTC  

Normally I can use science to refute religious argument. But science does not go against it.

2017-06-09 01:16:16 UTC  

Hitler was just doing his job

2017-06-09 01:16:32 UTC  

Science goes against a literal interpretation of the books

2017-06-09 01:16:32 UTC  

Science ought not be used to refute religion.

2017-06-09 01:16:43 UTC  

That makes no sense.

2017-06-09 01:16:50 UTC  

So we have our own interpretations, that is, masters in earth

2017-06-09 01:17:05 UTC  

Religion takes place in an entirely analytically separate circuit of the brain than logic.

2017-06-09 01:17:12 UTC  

it makes sense because you can't take the evolution and the data about the earth literally