Message from @Anglican
Discord ID: 322543970024423426
Most of the Bible are modern law from God.
Holy fuckin scroll of text
Pretty much.
I don't believe in abrahamic gods, in a strong way that I'm sure
@OF-8 You only have to read CHAPTER 3
THE EXISTENCE OF GOD
Got it.
One paragraph.
but other things, other "it-could-be" I don't know for sure
but I don't want to believe in anything, it could be there's a pony in the moon
Done.
>God is not real because of my personal and secular morals disagree with it
no
I rejected it because it was contradictory
Ok so as I see it this is like me saying. "God poked a quark and now you're here"
And also, if a book based on belief messed with these things; I'd reject it too
Well. Yeah. Can't argue against it really and why try?
otherwise I'm just ceding blind authority
It's annoying
It's time. Bro.
It's saying that time is an affect of god.
@OF-8 Yes, time and motion.
You can kinda run with that logically.
exactly, but corruptible and blind faith
I reject those faiths
See I think motion is just a device to illustrate time.
Here in this paragraph.
Sure.
It can be used for control easily
So you'd oppress other people just for beliefs
hitler was a good man
in religion?
dont dare oppress me
Normally I can use science to refute religious argument. But science does not go against it.
Hitler was just doing his job
Science goes against a literal interpretation of the books
Science ought not be used to refute religion.
That makes no sense.
So we have our own interpretations, that is, masters in earth
Religion takes place in an entirely analytically separate circuit of the brain than logic.
it makes sense because you can't take the evolution and the data about the earth literally