Eh, private property as in houses and farms? Or as in large factory complexs?

I mean, I believe in private/communal ownership of the means of production by the workers.

But I'd say a single farm should be owned by a family and not a full fledge worker democrayc.

What if the farm was legally occupied but not privately owned?

As in...

Like, what?

Socialism.

I mean, that sounds like just another way of saying that they may not have a deed to the land but it's still there's?

The executive is handled by the state.

@Anglican Apartments and houses in USSR belonged to the government but the individual had a right and title to use it.

>own by government

No

wut?

the hell

It shoudl be owned by the people who live there.

All together, in a democracy.

@Anglican Why_

In order to allow for blooming of student and youth culture

the majority of those who inhabit apartements.

Look at Housing Co-Ops in the United Kingdom, they are beautiful inside

@Anglican But you can use them exactly as if it would be yours.

and all the rooms are personalised and special.

Can you really trust the government to establish 100% proper housing regulations?

Can you trust private landlords?

@Anglican Yes.

Did I say landlords?

No.

No, I said housing co-ops.

Which is a similar system to worker co-ops

@Anglican USSR didn't have housing problems or homeless ever.

You could use government apartments or exchange them to different one or get another one.

It's different.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YD-xxoQwOo4

I'm not talking about homelessness

http://imgur.com/1zAKM9G

this is what I believe

but instead I'm talking the rules within those apartment blocks, and their apperance and daily running

nork orthodoxy

North Korea has these fake churches

So what is the difference between farms and housing co-ops?