Message from @Mros

Discord ID: 322598911866961920


2017-06-09 04:44:59 UTC  

that's different

2017-06-09 04:45:19 UTC  

There is a large spider on my window

2017-06-09 04:45:25 UTC  

KILL IT

2017-06-09 04:45:44 UTC  

It is twitching one of its legs

2017-06-09 04:45:50 UTC  

Moving its fangs eating something

2017-06-09 04:45:54 UTC  

The body is the shape of a booger

2017-06-09 04:46:06 UTC  

@Firefly Let me review it.

2017-06-09 04:46:32 UTC  

They always come out night

2017-06-09 04:46:40 UTC  

If you want to see where the insects come from

2017-06-09 04:46:47 UTC  

Stay up late and pay attention to the walls

2017-06-09 04:46:56 UTC  

Are they dangerous?

2017-06-09 04:47:12 UTC  

I don't know if this spider is dangerous

2017-06-09 04:47:23 UTC  

But it is oddly shaped

2017-06-09 04:48:10 UTC  

*Oddly shaped*

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/308950154222895104/322597719552163843/Black_flag.jpg

2017-06-09 04:48:30 UTC  

If you are lucky you may catch different insects fighting.

2017-06-09 04:48:53 UTC  

Once I saw this tiny dot of a spider continually pounce at this flat silverfish thing

2017-06-09 04:51:44 UTC  

If there are rodents in your house they will also come out at night

2017-06-09 04:51:55 UTC  

If you do not make too much noise

2017-06-09 04:52:39 UTC  

I'll go now, bye

2017-06-09 04:52:44 UTC  

Alright.

2017-06-09 04:52:54 UTC  

Good talking to you, have a nice day.

2017-06-09 04:54:33 UTC  

@Firefly This is an attempted rescue of the Steady State theory, suggesting that as galaxies moved apart, the idea was that new galaxies would form from matter that was supposed to be continually being created throughout space. Observations have shown more faint sources than predicted, indicating that the density sources were higher in the past. This was contrary to the basic assumption of the Steady State theory, that everything was constant in time. The Cambridge radio astronomy group did a survey of weak radio sources. These were distributed fairly uniformly across the sky, indicating that most of the sources lay outside our galaxy. The weaker sources would be further away, on average. However. observation shows a more faint sources than predicted, indicating that the density sources were higher in the past. This was contrary to the basic assumption presented here.

2017-06-09 04:56:17 UTC  

This reads like an undergraduate paper.

2017-06-09 04:59:23 UTC  

@Deleted User Its translated from Chinese.

2017-06-09 05:04:25 UTC  

@Deleted User I'm not sure if you disproved even this paper.

2017-06-09 05:14:11 UTC  

I can bring on them all night.

2017-06-09 05:16:21 UTC  

Cosmological Big Bang model is insufficient to explain appearance of energy at the time of the beginning which is not in accord with the first law of thermodynamics. Today is generally accepted in astronomy that β€œred shift” has gravitational origin which puts under the question expansion of the universe. On the other side NASA confirms that universal space has a shape of Euclidean space which is infinite. Something that is infinite cannot expand. Recent time research confirms universe does not exist in time which is merely a mathematical parameter of universal changes. These discoveries require careful checking foundations of Big Bang model which seems has no fundaments to remain a leading cosmological model of today physics.

2017-06-09 05:17:35 UTC  

This is nothing really to disprove. The first half is trying to shit on Big Bang (it's not perfect), then it introduces Dirac's Quantum Mechanics and tries to say that the negative pressure in space could be much greater than predicted, to try and explain away the problem that density appears higher in the past. Now they want to say that new galaxies are not created, but established galaxies just get bigger. That's a nice idea but there is no observations of this. Strangely they refer to Earth geology to be an analogy for galaxies.

2017-06-09 05:18:22 UTC  

In the Chinese paper.

2017-06-09 05:19:49 UTC  

@Deleted User What about the last paper with the director of physics institute in Slovenia telling you the same?

2017-06-09 05:20:43 UTC  

IFLScience is clickbait.

2017-06-09 05:22:16 UTC  

Bijective epistemology based on bijective function of set theory fulfils Einstein’s vision about completeness of a given scientific model which requires that each element of a model has exactly one counterpart in the universe. Application of bijective epistemology in cosmology suggests that universe is a non-created system in a permanent dynamic equilibrium. Man is born and he dies. He thinks the same about universe. Our paper shows this "birth-death" approach is not applicable on the universe. Universe is a non created system in a permanent dynamic equilibrium, where time is merely a mathematical parameter of material changes.

2017-06-09 05:23:37 UTC  

Are you sure big bang theory is the only and holy?

2017-06-09 05:25:29 UTC  

Would you trust more to the catholic priest?