Nice

Jeff, I am an anti-capitalist and anti-globalist

Maybe you don't need resource redistribution, but someone out there does.

you both have only insulted eachother throughout this entire discussion

@Deleted User Is correct.

>discussion

You cannot have a discussion with someone who believes they are right no matter what

That's not a discussion

So you're an anti-capitalist? Are you a socialist or a communist?

That can lead nowhere

It is talking to a literal brick wall

I am not a Communist, but a Market Socialist with Corporatist tendencies.

Therefore, 'assuming nothing' is not the default position.

Or something like a freak syndicalist.

Focusing on bettering this world in practical ways is much more useful than spreading useless religion

Therefore religion wastes time

It only is useful if you ASSUME it is true

The religion improves the society which we live in with material benefits.

Thus it is circular reasoning

Circular reasoning is for idiots

Okay, but corporations exist to make money, not to redistribute resources

You have to construct reasoning in order for it to be circular...

Such as a universal moral code, or a communit surrounding Churches.

@Jeff I oppose Corporations.

Morals exist without religion you idiot

I mean like, I believe in a mixed economy.

In fact I'd say some religious morals are falling behind modern morals

>morals exist
Citation needed.

Not true morals.

Like being anti transgender and anti LGBT

Who said *I was anti-transgender?*

I never said that

While I may be against **LGB**

Religion however breeds tbis

That's because you're trans right

Transgender people are just attempting to get past a uneasiness between the flesh and spirit.

You are literally so biased in favor of everything of yourself

There is no hope talking to you

most memeplexes will oppose lgbt tho, naturally

as they require a population to propagate

@Deleted User I'm an example of having morals without being an idiot