Iron Cross

oh

So basically emotional constructs not based in necessity...

regardless you shouldn't insult him while he isn't here to atleast defend himself

We identify these things as morals but they would exist regardless

Morals are evolutionarily useful for social animals to function together

Emotion does not prove the existence of god

Does morality exist without emotions?

Why does Peter Parker be Spiderman?

They can exist

I know psychopaths who are very compatible

But emotions make socializing easier

And pulls society closer

Anyhow

Kind of off topic comment as that has nothing to do with proving god

So you are saying emotions are favourable...

In the context of socializing

Not proving the existence of god

Read again

I'm getting there.

Emotions allow for free will

>free will

You can't choose something without a preference. You can't have a preference without emotion.

More like prevent it

Yes your preference forces your choice

Do people choose their emotions that are favourable to society?

What like murder is bad?

Humans are evolutionarily designed to not want to do that for no reason

Your preferences are a part of you. So basically a part of you forces your choices. Which means you choose by the force of emotion. Thus free will is emotional.

It's not really free will then

It's just choice

?

Just like animals make choices

So people, without choosing, act in a favourable way, based on a blind assumption from emotion.

Do animals have free will?

If you have self-control, you have free will.

It's not a blind assumption

Society won't work if everyone is murdering each other

People who did that died off

You have to be free from impulse. For example, if you can keep jogging even when you're tired, you have free will.

Sure but why are you jogging