Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 324805739807768576
A Muslim can assume truth
A Christian can assume truth
An atheist can assume truth
But sometimes that assumption resembles truth.
Assuming things exist is literally retarded
It resembles truth because you want to believe it does
It makes you happy
It helps you cope
Retarded line of logic
It says nothing about *truth*
Simply what YOU want truth to be
Do you understand?
truth seems to be an unrelated topic
No it's not
We're talking about the effectiveness of emotion in debates
In this case the existence of god
It is utterly useless
but im not talking about god
w t f
Then get out of the conversation
I'm not arguing two people on different topics at the same time
Wait your turn
I am stating that sometimes people believe in something before is has been 'proven' by reason. It is therefore possible to resemble truth through emotion, a hypothesis formed by intuition.
Sometimes people believe in things that are later proven
That's just confirmation bias
It says nothing about whether it is true
If I was some guy in 1000 ad
For some reason my emotions told me germs exist
I can't reasonably claim they exist without proof
There is some intuitive wisdom in emotion.
That's called confirmation bias
That's called a gamble gone right
A gamble
Nothing else
Right now I can also assume Tengri exists
Or Allah exists
While others claim other gods exist
Based on faith alone
One person will be right
There's no reason why you should gamble