but that's not how it actually works in this society-- actually owners can invest in stock and put in no work at all

i want society to work the way you falsely implied it does, that's all

when you agree to work for someone, you're forgoing a whole host of risks and challenges such as market stability and supply and demand of goods in exchange for an agreed upon and steady wage, you get paid what you're worth whether you're some bum off the street or a highly skilled intern or technician

the guy who owns the company generally built that company from the ground up or was there for most of its growth

hm? are you explaining to me how employment works? i know

yes so what are you not understanding

no, the guy who owns the company is generally a multinational, what planet do you live on

my boss was not a multinational

that's not the general rule

he lived across the street from me

what products did you sell

cabins

like rooms you could rent

were the things you sold *bought* from people who made their companies from the ground up

that we wheeled out to you

or was it just from sysco of course

no they were hand built by my bos

boss

do you think that's how most of the economy works

more or less yeah it is

what do you think about land ownership

supply and demand

i think land ownership is great

why

do you think everything should be publicly owned?

how the fuck does it fit into your scheme

do you have to make the land yourself

no what

Most things should be...

im just gonna let you explain your point of view so I wont interrupt

so doesn't everyone who made something themselves owe the land, without which they literally have nothing

owe?

you mean own the land?

no owe

the land provided all they have

they owe the land they did their work on?

yes

even if that were the case, so?

and the land their materials came from

without land there's nothing

and nobody made land