Message from @Tristan-Jyrki
Discord ID: 330682256148398081
Leaders don't equal state lmao
but I do know about it
that's against literally all theory
but sure
I can have a bad habit of crucifying ;P
you're just not agreeing
think that way
state
steɪt/Submit
noun
a nation or territory considered as an organized political community under one government.
"Germany, Italy, and other European states"
synonyms: country, nation, land, sovereign state, nation state, kingdom, empire, republic, confederation, federation, body politic, commonwealth, power, world power, superpower, polity, domain, territory; More
But yeah all ideologies are puritanism
>Dictionary
the dictionary doesnt agree with you so it must be purged
we'll make a new dictionary
a better one
It just literally goes against anarchist and marxist theory, which we're talking about here. I just mentioned an anarchist commune, which you deem a state
you've just colloqualized the term 'state' to mean a powerful cabal of bourgoise leaders
In human development, class society didn't arise until the advancement out of hunter-gatherer society.
No I didn't lmao?
How?
what were chiefs then
I said the state is an apparatus of the ruling class.
Chiefs were generally after hunter-gatherers boi.
so hunter gatherers had no elders, no leaders of any kind
just like how wild bovine herds have no alpha males or leadership, theyre just a collective herd with no direction right?
Elders weren't always leaders, my dude
yes thatw as sarcasm
but they were though
it wasnt every man for himself
>no chiefs equals no leaders
wtf
early humans worked together
You keep strawmanning my point.
no I'm not
Like as if you CANT have a collective consensus on who's more qualified to make certain decisions
which isn't a state, tard.
There always has to be a leader
and an identity or whatever the fuck
like what?
yes so a collective of people with leaders, thats what we call a state
Read early human history
you want a stateless state